Free Allegiance Forums

I liked the fact that Avirst was ignored by everyone and yet he still kept trying to say witty things and failing. I consider that lobby ban a public service.

BV has been alerted to this & he will be dealing with it as he sees fit.

Also I do recall some bans taking effect after SG's rather than before, BV's call though so maybe we should wait for the decision before whining about it

I only care about a ban if its enforced tomorrow. If not then it's not interesting so don't bother with it at all.

spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Oct 16 2010, 07:40 PM) Last person I banned was adept and I got a 2 week ban for it. This time it was avirst and I'm sure I will get a ban for that too.

If you repeatedly ban people when you apparently shouldn't (judging by the fact that you get banned for it), why are you still allowed to ban people at all?

girlyboy wrote:QUOTE (girlyboy @ Oct 17 2010, 01:14 PM) If you repeatedly ban people when you apparently shouldn't (judging by the fact that you get banned for it), why are you still allowed to ban people at all?

Ouch

girlyboy wrote:QUOTE (girlyboy @ Oct 16 2010, 10:14 PM) If you repeatedly ban people when you apparently shouldn't (judging by the fact that you get banned for it), why are you still allowed to ban people at all?

Because it's lobby banning, and making just spidey not be able to lobby ban when he has GC would require a code change.

Illuminatti

Ban $#@!wit spidermoing if yuou want I'll $#@!inug comm the swaud game we'll $#@!ign rape RT bitches.

you might actually be doing sysx a favor if you ban spidey before the squadgame

Thats what I'm saying. It's a lot more interesting if Spidey doesnt show tomorrow. (IE who will comm? what will they do? how will sysx react? can rt beat them? can the confidence level of rt be increased anymore than it already has? outcome?)