Free Allegiance Forums

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:26 pm**

Yes it would have been the courteous thing to do. But did anyone expect anything different?

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:34 pm**

Damn, there was so much potential for future drama... all down the drain now. BS is much to mature to act as DSM replacement. We need yet another new squad.

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:36 pm**

notjarvis wrote:QUOTE (notjarvis @ Jan 19 2010, 08:17 AM) I'm very intrigued now about this post. Do tell...

Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Jan 19 2010, 07:12 AM) Why would I apologize?

Rofl.

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:50 pm**

Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Jan 19 2010, 06:11 AM) Nothing is changing on your end. Just a bunch of new players.

Then it's not a merge, it's a DEFECTION.

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:54 pm**

Bard wrote:QUOTE (Bard @ Jan 19 2010, 08:50 AM) Then it's not a merge, it's a DEFECTION en masse.

Fixed.
Defection is singular.

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:06 pm**

How many people from DSM want to go to BS?

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:28 pm**

kramari wrote:QUOTE (kramari @ Jan 19 2010, 03:06 PM) How many people from DSM want to go to BS?

i'd guess all of em

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:29 pm**

Good luck!

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:32 pm**

Huh . . . .

Posted: **Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:41 pm**

This is sad.

Having a new squad led by MW and all the additional drama around was fun!

Free Allegiance Forums

DSM merges with BS