Page 3 of 13

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:26 pm
by MadAccountant
Yes it would have been the courteous thing to do. But did anyone expect anything different?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:34 pm
by Grimmwolf_GB
Damn, there was so much potential for future drama... all down the drain now. BS is much to mature to act as DSM replacement. We need yet another new squad. :)

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:36 pm
by spideycw
notjarvis wrote:QUOTE (notjarvis @ Jan 19 2010, 08:17 AM) I'm very intrigued now about this post. Do tell...
Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Jan 19 2010, 07:12 AM) Why would I apologize?

Rofl.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:50 pm
by Bard
Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Jan 19 2010, 06:11 AM) Nothing is changing on your end. Just a bunch of new players.
Then it's not a merge, it's a DEFECTION.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 1:54 pm
by RohanRider
Bard wrote:QUOTE (Bard @ Jan 19 2010, 08:50 AM) Then it's not a merge, it's a DEFECTION en masse.
Fixed.
Defection is singular.

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:06 pm
by kramari
How many people from DSM want to go to BS?

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:28 pm
by Loriana
kramari wrote:QUOTE (kramari @ Jan 19 2010, 03:06 PM) How many people from DSM want to go to BS?
i'd guess all of em

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:29 pm
by l1ngus
Good luck!

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:32 pm
by fuzzylunkin1
Huh . . . .

Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 2:41 pm
by Makida
This is sad. :sad: Having a new squad led by MW and all the additional drama around was fun!