Free Allegiance Forums

Problem is, QFs have to be carried with you from the moment you leave base, meaning the only time to have them in your inventory is if you're planning to dogfight against ints and nothing else. And there are very few good reasons to attack ints when you're flying a fig.

I find QF3 quite effective at killing nans on a bomb run tbh..

Death3D wrote:QUOTE (Death3D @ Dec 21 2009, 10:10 AM) Rename and sticky this, please?

Nah.

Andarvi wrote:QUOTE (Andarvi @ Dec 21 2009, 09:36 AM) I find QF3 quite effective at killing nans on a bomb run tbh..

I still find aiming more effective .

QF3 does less damage (even with increased firing...), chaffs more easily (and since you have more missiles in the air this is substantial), has shorter range, runs out faster (since you fire so quickly), has a lower maximum lock.

A seeker missile at a low lock is around the equivalent of a full lock quickfire, except it does more damage when it hits and will take slightly longer to refire.

Yeah. Those quickfires are useful.

If you use quickfires incorrectly, then yes, the above will become true and seekers will be more effective.

If you use quickfires correctly, then they are superior to seekers. QF3 v Seeker3, QF3 is better for its burst damage rather than total damage.

(Here's a free tip, don't spam your QFs. You're not supposed to)

Seymor wrote:QUOTE (Seymor @ Dec 22 2009, 05:17 AM) Yeah. Those quickfires are useful.

I am with Drizzo on this one, so I agree that we disagree Seymour. It comes down to what floats your boat.

The definitive and debated QF topic
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...showtopic=50941

Seymor wrote:QUOTE (Seymor @ Dec 22 2009, 06:17 AM) A seeker missile at a low lock is around the equivalent of a full lock quickfire, except it does more damage when it hits and will take slightly longer to refire.

Aha, I always thought Seymor had no clue what he was talking about, now I have conclusive proof. `yp!

Let's take a look at those DM's
One of these things is not like the other.
One of these things is total crap.
Can you tell which thing is not totally crappy
By the time I finish my song?

C'mon Class, together.

Let's see what the real damage is
That's right. Seeker does a little under twice the damage of quickfires. That means that for every seeker that hits, Quickfire has to hit twice. Also, you can't look at me with a straight face and say that quickfire does burst damage when one dumbfires does three times the damage of a quickfire. Burst damage, hehe. Dumbfire 3 has some tracking too (Not good tracking, but some).

Everything is light hull right?
So quickfires do reduced damage to interceptors and highly reduced damage to fighters and scouts shield. It seems that Quickfires only do full damage to stealth fighters. I will now concede that if you are having trouble dogfighting stealth fighters in your fighter, that firing quickfires at yourself to create a shield that might absorb incoming hunters is a viable option. You might also want to try flying in squares; a challenge, I know.

Let's see how well it can get to it's target..
So, you are going to be firing at greater than twice the rate (and therefore have twice as many missiles in the air to get the chaff check) and your quickfires have a crappy cm resistance. Yeah, this is going to work swell. Not only that, they also turn insane so if they do get chaffed, theres not going to be any accidental hits. Only good things here about quickfires is the low amount of time spent in the air.
Seeker wins here. It's not entirely relevant but it's noticable.

Alright.

Vortog: They're good against ints? You think doing half the damage of seekers and a third of the damage of dumbfires is good against ints? You think increased susceptibility to chaffing is good against ints?

Andarvi: Nans on a bomb run? You find that doing a third of the damage of seekers and a fifth of the damage of dumbfires is good against nans on a bomb run? You think those quickfires are also good against the _BOMBER_ too or are you just gonna kill all the nans?

Drizzo: Burst Damage? Really? Are you having that much trouble hitting with dumbfires?

Vortog: You can agree with yourself to do whatever you want to do. I however, have lots of shiny numbers and examples to support my argument, which usually makes things more compelling. Have fun agreeing to agree.

TurkeyXIII: You caught me, kind of.


Could somebody calculate the maximum speed that quickfires, seekers and dumbfires get upto at the end of their flight? It has consequences on how easy it is to simply run away from the missiles.

I'm gonna study now.

Seymor the [prominent] difference between you and I is you use numbers, I use gameplay experience. [Well actually we have nothing in common]

If I say something, it's usually because I can prove it. So set up a testing environment and I'll gladly show you how QF outclasses Seeker and the few instances where Seeker is superior.

Well to be honest I could use numbers to prove what I mean, but frankly I don't feel like putting that much effort into proving someone wrong on the forums.