Page 3 of 9
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:31 pm
by Dogbones
From Northern Virginia
Umm, there is a purpose of that little summary/average line at the bottom /glare.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":glare:" border="0" alt="glare.gif" />
We don't need to see each individual ping, unless you are trying to point out a lag spike or instability, the little summary even shows the min and max times /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> Use ping -t (on Windows systems, and hit Ctrl-C after a screen full or so).
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 57, Received = 57, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 129ms, Maximum = 196ms, Average = 147ms
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:20 pm
by hockey1015
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 174ms
location: Upstate New York, USA
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:24 pm
by Bard
Code: Select all
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 39, Received = 39, Lost = 0 (0% loss)
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 140ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 143ms
Minneapolis area, Minnesota
Code: Select all
Tracing route to www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 10 ms 10 ms 20 ms 73.115.196.1
2 10 ms 10 ms * 68.87.179.25
3 10 ms 10 ms * te-8-1-ur01.anoka.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.174.54]
4 10 ms 10 ms * te-8-3-ur02.anoka.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.174.58]
5 10 ms 10 ms * te-8-1-ur01.hamlake.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.174.62]
6 10 ms 10 ms * te-8-3-ur02.hamlake.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.174.66]
7 10 ms * 20 ms te-2-2-ar02.roseville.mn.minn.comcast.net [68.87.174.69]
8 30 ms 20 ms 30 ms 12.118.20.9
9 50 ms 40 ms 50 ms tbr1-p010901.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.123.24.202]
10 41 ms 40 ms 40 ms tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.29]
11 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms gar1-p360.ascva.ip.att.net [12.122.80.193]
12 40 ms 40 ms 50 ms 12.118.44.38
13 130 ms 120 ms 120 ms t2c2-ge7-0-0.us-ash.eu.bt.net [166.49.237.106]
14 120 ms 120 ms 120 ms t2c2-p9-0.uk-eal.eu.bt.net [166.49.164.54]
15 130 ms 120 ms 110 ms t2c1-p7-1.uk-eal.eu.bt.net [166.49.237.85]
16 110 ms 120 ms 110 ms t2c1-p8-0.uk-glo.eu.bt.net [166.49.208.126]
17 140 ms 140 ms 150 ms t2c1-p1-0.de-fra.eu.bt.net [166.49.195.110]
18 131 ms 130 ms 140 ms t2a7-ge6-0.de-fra.eu.bt.net [166.49.172.98]
19 131 ms 140 ms 130 ms f-226-10.frankfurt.ipgprs.viaginterkom.de [62.180.226.10]
20 151 ms 140 ms 150 ms L0.erf2-g.mcbone.net [62.104.191.152]
21 171 ms 370 ms 221 ms G1.erf2-c2.mcbone.net [62.104.207.4]
22 140 ms 150 ms 141 ms erfurt02.fdknet.de [194.97.172.162]
23 140 ms 150 ms 141 ms vl1.c6500.ef.de.megabit.biz [193.22.254.200]
24 270 ms 491 ms 150 ms ns.km12508.keymachine.de [62.141.52.5]
I'd say 143ms average over 24 hops isn't bad at all.
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:26 pm
by Clay_Pigeon
Code: Select all
PING www.keyweb.de (62.141.52.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=139.681 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=140.821 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=141.157 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=140.696 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=140.529 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=140.529 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=140.461 ms
^C
--- www.keyweb.de ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 139.681/140.553/141.157/0.419 ms
Location: Akron (Northeast), Ohio, USA
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:30 pm
by TheBored
Code: Select all
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\WINDOWS>ping www.keyweb.de
Pinging www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=49
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=49
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=49
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=126ms TTL=49
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 126ms, Maximum = 127ms, Average = 126ms
Location: Northfield, Vermont
TB
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:22 pm
by Shizoku
QUOTE Pinging
www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5]with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=52
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=52
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=173ms TTL=52
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5"
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 173ms, Maximum = 174ms, Average 173ms[/quote]
Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada (west coast)
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 9:22 pm
by parcival
Greece /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Code: Select all
Pinging www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=239ms TTL=47
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=215ms TTL=47
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=256ms TTL=47
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=303ms TTL=47
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 215ms, Maximum = 303ms, Average = 253ms
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:33 pm
by beauty
Spokane WA, USA
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 255ms, Maximum = 335ms, Average = 296ms
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:50 am
by asheron2k
Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 54, Received = 54, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 152ms, Maximum = 154ms, Average = 153ms
Texas, USA
Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 2:32 am
by chasov
minimum=220ms maximum=235ms average=223ms
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA