Free Allegiance Forums

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 5 2013, 05:29 PM) the Senate, which was elected by 164% of the players

Why 164% voted:

pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Jan 11 2013, 12:24 PM) Hey BT,

would be nice having a statistics page for ACSS.

The leaderboard only shows players which played a game which effects ranks, that's okay.

But you also know, that there are enough people who say "Allegiance is dead", just because numbers on leaderboard drop.

I ran a query to get active logins:

Code: Select all

Select COUNT(Id) from [CSS].[dbo].[Identity] where Datelastlogin > (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - 7);

So I ended up with 106 players on leaderboard and my query with 258 active players.

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 5 2013, 05:29 PM) in a vote where one of the leading candidates was summarily stricken from the ballot

Someone who doesn't follow the rules (RoC/ToS), like in real live, disqualifies himself.

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 5 2013, 05:29 PM) and two others directly appointed without any sort of vote

It wasn't my idea to appoint two Senators, the Allegiance Senate Constitution, the people which helped me to rewrite and update the Constitution, recommend to do so. The idea behind this was to avoid that the Senate was doomed to failure.

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 5 2013, 05:29 PM) to discuss issues in a secret forum

Only the internal discussion and voting forum are secret, because there are things which shouldn't be public. There is also a special forum for the Senate to invite people for internal discussions, which wasn't used yet. It's not my fault that the Senate doesn't communicate with the Community and the Community not with the Senate. Most of the past issues were picked up by the Senate themselves.

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Feb 5 2013, 05:29 PM) and issue non-binding resolutions in accordance to a Constitution pkk wrote himself.

Who said there are non-binding resolutions?

Again, I've wrote the Constitution with the help of other community members, for example BackViper. The whole point was the ZLs were unable to find a successor for themselves and even were unable to a make a decision.

I liked my version better. Way to ruin it with the facts, Captain Buzzkill.

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 5 2013, 07:58 AM) The other option is to give yourself 2 votes until the extra senator is restored. That way you have more power but can still be voted down by a majority. Hopefully it's only a temporary blip and won't be used either way.

That's called being a chairman you gammy twat!

In the event of a tie the chair get's the casting vote.