Page 2 of 3
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:34 pm
by the.ynik
_xJammer_ wrote:QUOTE (_xJammer_ @ Dec 9 2010, 12:21 AM) Adept, I understand your input in that game, but you have to realise that right now, no faction will work well against TF, especially if the non-TF faction has an average commander. You also forgot to point out that it was mini3 hvy TF ints that were defending, with all of the perks, and belter nan1 advscouts for a long while.
It's clear the CC team needs to do two things:
1) Nerf TF
2) Nerf xJammer

Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:57 pm
by Adept
_xJammer_ wrote:QUOTE (_xJammer_ @ Dec 9 2010, 01:21 AM) Adept, I understand your input in that game, but you have to realise that right now, no faction will work well against TF, especially if the non-TF faction has an average commander. You also forgot to point out that it was mini3 hvy TF ints that were defending, with all of the perks, and belter nan1 advscouts for a long while.
We did stop several with mini 2 ints, but granted they were TF ints.
I fully agree that TF needs fixing, no doubt about that. Still, I kind of joined that expecting to be owned by high speed bombers, and spent my time herding people to defend. Eventually we got heavy ints, then mini 3 and I mostly stopped worrying. The insane acceleration of TF hellps a lot when responding to the very, very high speed bombers. On the other side, no prox. I was repeatedly cought in a TF scout (if those thing can be called scouts), but still did my bit by killing a nan or two with my twin gats.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:08 am
by LANS
Deep40000 wrote:QUOTE (Deep40000 @ Dec 8 2010, 06:34 PM) LANS how the hell did you do that?
Do what?
Plough through prox without dying? I had good nans.
Double-post? My connection is iffy. I was using my university's public wireless network when posting. Somehow the post got sent twice. I once quadruple-posted on this connection.
Remove my first double-post? I didn't do that, someone else who can delete posts did.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:21 am
by FreeBeer
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:29 am
by LANS
FreeBeer wrote:QUOTE (FreeBeer @ Dec 8 2010, 07:21 PM)
All hail the ninja umm.... nan? Post deleter? Connection iffy-izer? Packet theif?
Ninja packet thief!
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 12:59 am
by Deep40000
Post deleter.
I WAS reffering to the double post
Just that there's a 60 second delay between being able to post and found it odd that you were able to double post.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:46 am
by LANS
Deep40000 wrote:QUOTE (Deep40000 @ Dec 8 2010, 07:59 PM) Post deleter.
I WAS reffering to the double post
Just that there's a 60 second delay between being able to post and found it odd that you were able to double post.
Not that I know of.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:22 am
by Deep40000
wth, that wasn't a question, just a statement.
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 8:37 am
by jinox
Prox works excellent against them. And yest, I am puzzled to understand that nobody seemed to have tried that of my team... in the Non-TF, Belters game after that. Having fully rammed that bbr with a hvy int from a 30 degree angle along moving direction, I must say, the bbr just did not care... :/
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:53 am
by ThePhantom032
the.ynik wrote:QUOTE (the.ynik @ Dec 8 2010, 11:57 PM) Edit: and I remember Phantom needed like 6 ABs for an IC tele because he was being over-pushed.
actually it was 7 because a scout started nanning it while i kept missing
