Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:16 am
Because it's never their fault that they suck
Page 2 of 5
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:40 am
Spidey is already the combined forum admin for the rants and the CC forum. Why don't we merge them to the "Rantcore Subforum".
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:52 pm
Hey, come on, the last poll I ran just asked if people get insider information before joining a game!
Now if more commanders would get feedback from the team on what they think they are capable of flying properly instead of just choosing one at random 5 seconds into the game.
Now if more commanders would get feedback from the team on what they think they are capable of flying properly instead of just choosing one at random 5 seconds into the game.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:53 pm
Where on Earth do people keep finding videos of me?Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Oct 21 2010, 06:06 AM) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL3remBDiy0
PS - MY BAT. NO TOUCHIE!
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:17 pm
I will make a pool too. If anyone guesses the topic I wont make it. 
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 8:56 pm
Should Elzam be allowed to Comm?Archangelus wrote:QUOTE (Archangelus @ Oct 21 2010, 04:17 PM) I will make a pool too. If anyone guesses the topic I wont make it.
Should People be allowed to make stupid polls?
Is Adept Awesome? (Rhetorical question, we know he is!)
Is Allegiance Dead?
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:30 pm
Actually, CC team has discussed this, at least in vague terms. Aside from the above options, a more significant overhaul has been discussed.
One idea was to make the current Adv SF into a $250 ship you can research at basic Tac, and then create a brand new stealth fighter that flies more conventionally, but is less effective than interceptors or figs at killing miners.
Another idea was to keep the current SF, but add a $250 defensive ship in the mold of a Guardian or Gunship.
All that said, CC Team generally prefers smaller changes, and any Tac changes will probably wait until CC_12 or later. Before you ask, the ETA on CC_11 is Two Weeks.TM
One idea was to make the current Adv SF into a $250 ship you can research at basic Tac, and then create a brand new stealth fighter that flies more conventionally, but is less effective than interceptors or figs at killing miners.
Another idea was to keep the current SF, but add a $250 defensive ship in the mold of a Guardian or Gunship.
All that said, CC Team generally prefers smaller changes, and any Tac changes will probably wait until CC_12 or later. Before you ask, the ETA on CC_11 is Two Weeks.TM
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:09 pm
According to the poll we have an Alien51 infestation....*sirens*
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:13 pm
Bashing aside, I must say I really like the idea of a very-short-range gauss. It'd add a new element of gameplay. But it doesn't solve anything.
If you want to give sfs some durability without changing too much, the key is to give them their own shields, not med shields: low hp, but high generation so the SF/SB will actually benefit from bothering to mount it when eyed (SB hp can be reduced to compensate). This is already tested, and works beautifully.
If you want to give sfs some durability without changing too much, the key is to give them their own shields, not med shields: low hp, but high generation so the SF/SB will actually benefit from bothering to mount it when eyed (SB hp can be reduced to compensate). This is already tested, and works beautifully.
Posted: Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:16 pm
Or people could just learn to play