Former google guy says Internet will split

Non-Allegiance related. High probability of spam. Pruned regularly.
cashto
Posts: 3165
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:40 am
Location: Seattle

Post by cashto »

Radulfr wrote:QUOTE (Radulfr @ Oct 23 2018, 10:56 AM) There are however people that can tell you exactly when your WiFi Router is on and when not, because it hurts them.
No there aren't.

QUOTE Also, there is at least one study with mice being subjected to cell phone level radiation for extended periods of time. They got cancer.[/quote]

And there are numerous other studies that showed no such link. You're literally lbeing this chick.
Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 11 2018, 11:27 PM) as you know i think very little of cashto, cashto alway a flying low pilot, he alway flying a trainer airplane and he rented
Radulfr
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Radulfr »

cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Oct 23 2018, 04:35 PM) No there aren't.
You should NEVER rely on Wikipedia when it comes to disputed claims like this.
Believe me, there are people like that. Thousands of cases, and also I'm kind of one of them.
cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Oct 23 2018, 04:35 PM) And there are numerous other studies that showed no such link. You're literally lbeing this chick.
I said "at least one study", which I can remember looking at. Pretty sure there are more if you'd really look. That is although there is not much money to be had for producing that negative result, while many have an interest in claiming "all is safe".

Whatever, at least stop pretending that, just because EM radiation doesn't directly burn you, it can't be harmful.
Last edited by Radulfr on Wed Oct 24, 2018 5:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

Oh good god Radulfr is a "wifi radiation" wooniac?
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
Radulfr
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Radulfr »

Once upon a time, someone claimed that liberals are the tolerant ones. Doesn't seem like it anywhere I look.
LANS
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:17 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by LANS »

Radulfr wrote:QUOTE (Radulfr @ Oct 27 2018, 03:56 AM) Once upon a time, someone claimed that liberals are the tolerant ones. Doesn't seem like it anywhere I look.
Well, yeah. Its the paradox of tolerance. Normal people are only tolerant of conspiracy theorists and bull@#(! believers up to a point. Past that its more work than its worth to allow those people in your social circles. Don't expect me to be friendly with Nazis when they want to kill me because I was unlucky enough to be born Jewish.

You're well off into the deep end for most of us here.
Last edited by LANS on Sat Oct 27, 2018 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
Radulfr
Posts: 125
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:10 am

Post by Radulfr »

Wow LANS .. you are making me lose the last bit of faith I have in this community. I thought you were better than that.

First, who are you calling a Nazi and are you a jew? Otherwise that comment is plain ridiculous hypothesis and off topic. Why would you go there?

Second, the social circle we are talking about is a mostly public internet forum. (That gets policed by liberals.)

Third - "conspiracy theorists and bull@#(! believers"
Yes, that is how tolerance is defined. You tolerate people who are different, have different opinions, and different views.

Fourth - "its more work than its worth"
The "work" that is expected is for you to not mock, attack, etc. people who are different. The troll in you must be strong, if that is too much work.
ryujin
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:17 am

Post by ryujin »

Radulfr wrote:QUOTE (Radulfr @ Oct 28 2018, 11:57 AM) Bla bla bla
you are tolerated. you aren't censored. you aren't banned.

Tolerance does not equate to listening to racism and bull@#(! conspiracy theories and agreeing with them.
*#$@faced $#@!tard Troll
ryujin
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:17 am

Post by ryujin »

And it truly is "tolerance"

I once said something to a gay friend about how I was tolerant of homosexuals and what not.
His response "I don't want to be tolerated, thats kind of an insult. I want to be accepted."

So yea, Rafdullller. You are tolerated. Maybe change your mindset and lose your gullibility if you want to be accepted.
*#$@faced $#@!tard Troll
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

LANS wrote:QUOTE (LANS @ Oct 27 2018, 09:34 AM) Well, yeah. Its the paradox of tolerance. Normal people are only tolerant of conspiracy theorists and bull@#(! believers up to a point. Past that its more work than its worth to allow those people in your social circles. Don't expect me to be friendly with Nazis when they want to kill me because I was unlucky enough to be born Jewish.

You're well off into the deep end for most of us here.
Radulfr wrote:QUOTE (Radulfr @ Oct 28 2018, 08:57 AM) First, who are you calling a Nazi and are you a jew?
I'm going to go with "nazis" and "yes."

QUOTE Otherwise that comment is plain ridiculous hypothesis and off topic.[/quote]
It's EXACTLY on topic.


QUOTE Third - "conspiracy theorists and bull@#(! believers"
Yes, that is how tolerance is defined. You tolerate people who are different, have different opinions, and different views.

Fourth - "its more work than its worth"
The "work" that is expected is for you to not mock, attack, etc. people who are different. The troll in you must be strong, if that is too much work.[/quote]
I'm not tolerant of stupidity, sorry.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
peet
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Holland

Post by peet »

Oops wrong one.
Last edited by peet on Mon Oct 29, 2018 12:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Post Reply