Ryujin wrote:QUOTE (Ryujin @ Jun 17 2018, 04:07 PM) You reference a 568 Page Document as "proof of hillary's sex crimes."
I highly doubt you read any of it, let alone the whole thing.
I did take the time to search for "sex" in the document, it mentioned Anthony Weiner a few times, but not once did the search for "sex" come up with Hillary Clinton.
One again, you proved yourself to be uniformed, and idiotic.
The word Sex turns up 9 times. Here are the relevant sections:
Code: Select all
In September 2016, the FBI’s New York Field Office
(NYO) and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern
District of New York (SDNY) began investigating former
Congressman Anthony Weiner for his online relationship
with a minor. A federal search warrant was obtained on
September 26, 2016, for Weiner’s iPhone, iPad, and
laptop computer. The FBI obtained these devices the
same day. The search warrant authorized the
government to search for evidence relating to the
following crimes: transmitting obscene material to a
minor, sexual exploitation of children, and activities
related to child pornography.
Code: Select all
In September 2016, the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern
District of New York (SDNY) began investigating former Congressman Anthony
Weiner for his online relationship with a minor. The FBI’s New York Field Office
(NYO) was in charge of the investigation. A federal search warrant was obtained on
September 26, 2016, for Weiner’s iPhone, iPad, and laptop computer. The FBI
obtained these devices the same day. The search warrant authorized the
government to search for evidence relating to the following crimes: transmitting
obscene material to a minor, sexual exploitation of children, and activities related to
child pornography.
Code: Select all
The AUSAs provided written guidance to the case agent about how to handle
review of the laptop. In a September 28 email to the case agent and the SSA,
AUSA 1 advised that the case agent should review “only evidence of crimes related
to the sexual exploitation of children, enticement, and obscenity” and instructed the
case agent “that all emails and other communications between Anthony Weiner and
Huma Abedin (even if there are other parties to the communication) should be
sequestered and not reviewed at this time.” The case agent agreed and responded
that the “[o]nly emails I will review are those to/from Weiner accounts to which
[Huma Abedin] is not party.
Code: Select all
Strzok stated that he was sure that “got called up to Andy’s” referred to
McCabe’s office, but he had no recollection of that meeting. Strzok could not recall
who first told him about the Weiner laptop, only recalling that someone told him
that some “Clinton-type emails” had been discovered in New York. Strzok’s notes
from September 28 stated, “NY invest Weiner sexting 15 y’o. Weiner atty produces
copy of everything Weiner has on iCloud to SDNY. Significant email from Huma
[NFI – their email vs. her independent email]? Relevance to MYE, Clinton
Foundation? MYE go review.” Strzok stated that he initially planned to send a
team to New York to review the emails, but that a conference call with NYO was
scheduled instead. (This conference call, which occurred on September 29, is
discussed below.)
Code: Select all
On 09/28/2016, EAD Randall Coleman received for [sic] call from AD
Bill Sweeney indicating team of Agents investigating Anthony Weiner
sexting case had discovered emails relevant to Clinton email
investigation. AD Sweeney advised team had halted further review
and would be requesting guidance from FBIHQ. EAD Coleman agreed
and advised he would notify FBI General Counsel James Baker and DD
Andrew McCabe. The call was concluded. On 09/28/2016,
immediately after call with AD Sweeney, Coleman telephonically
contacted DD McCabe at his office number to advise him of the
circumstance described by AD Sweeney. DD McCabe advised he had
already been made aware of matt
Code: Select all
from October 4 contained the following entry:
(1) Anthony Wiener [sic]
(2) [Unrelated]
(3) Wiener [sic] – texting 15 yo – Sexually Explicit
9/26 – Federal SW – IPhone/IPAD/Laptop
Code: Select all
In March 2015, the OIG issued a report pertaining to the handling of sexual harassment
allegations by the Department’s four law enforcement components, the FBI, the Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S.
Marshal’s Service (USMS). In that report, we noted that all four components had weaknesses
detecting sexually explicit text messages and images, and that two components did not archive text
messages sent and received by its employees. We therefore recommended that all four law
enforcement components, in coordination with ODAG, should (1) acquire and implement technology
and establish procedures to effectively preserve text messages and images for a reasonable period of
time, and should make that information available to misconduct investigators and for discovery
purposes; and (2) take concrete steps to acquire and implement technology to proactively monitor
text message and image data for potential misconduct. See U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Office
of the Inspector General (OIG), The Handling of Sexual Harassment and Misconduct Allegations by the
Department’s Law Enforcement Components, Evaluation and Inspections Division Report 15-04 (March
2016), https://go.usa.gov/xQGz4 (accessed May 9, 2018).
(this last one mentions it three times.)
Globey: which of these leads you to conclude that HRC was involved in a sex ring.