He might be asking when R5 was released, or when the problem was introduced, to back up his claim that he told us so.Wasp wrote:QUOTE (Wasp @ Aug 18 2016, 05:53 AM) If you look at the dates of our posts, you can see that we were discussing this on the 12th and 13th of August which was around 4 days ago.
Allegiance's reorganization
I thought so too, but maybe Wasp was telling him to read earlier posts that say when the problem was introduced (2009).Dome wrote:QUOTE (Dome @ Aug 19 2016, 01:24 AM) He might be asking when R5 was released, or when the problem was introduced, to back up his claim that he told us so.
QUOTE 08/28/16 05:14:44: fufi (all): every day a jimmy setting makes your skin wonderful nice
08/29/16 01:04:27: fufi (all): they get creamed with mostion loisture lotion[/quote]
08/29/16 01:04:27: fufi (all): they get creamed with mostion loisture lotion[/quote]
I know what he was asking for and why he was asking for it. He is looking to make an argument so I derailed him immediately.
He lost all credibility when he applied bayesian probability (trueskill) to the ranking system while ignoring the underlying premise that the players must be the sole responsible party for game outcome.
edit:typo
He lost all credibility when he applied bayesian probability (trueskill) to the ranking system while ignoring the underlying premise that the players must be the sole responsible party for game outcome.
edit:typo
Last edited by Wasp on Sat Aug 20, 2016 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Sgt_BakerII
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:00 pm
Wasp wrote:QUOTE (Wasp @ Aug 19 2016, 03:19 PM) I know what he was asking for and why he was asking for it. He is looking to make an argument so I derailed him immediately.
He lost all credibility when he applied baysien probability to the ranking system while ignoring the underlying premise that the players must be the sole responsible party for game outcome.
Erm, yeah. Thanks for the derailing, as you put it.
-
Sgt_BakerII
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:00 pm
Am I wondering that?Sgt_BakerII wrote:QUOTE (Sgt_BakerII @ Aug 19 2016, 03:58 PM) And you wonder why nothing ever gets done around here?
No, I'm using Visual StudioSgt_BakerII wrote:QUOTE (Sgt_BakerII @ Aug 19 2016, 03:58 PM) Struggling to fix bugs introduced seven years ago yet still with the bickering and ad hominems?
I won'tSgt_BakerII wrote:QUOTE (Sgt_BakerII @ Aug 19 2016, 03:58 PM) Please, don't allow me to stand in the way...
-
Sgt_BakerII
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:00 pm
I threw this project out for "bid" and I got a few bites. The downside is that in each case, the Dx9 project is far more difficult than pushing the Dx7 version "up to date" so to speak.
I think the Devs got in over their head and was simply too ambitious when trying to leap from Dx7 to Dx9. Even though, Dx9 was put into place and you're stuck with it.
Given the history of the FA Organization, it will never be corrected so if you want it working, you'll have to do as they suggested 6 years ago..."fix it yourself".
I think the Devs got in over their head and was simply too ambitious when trying to leap from Dx7 to Dx9. Even though, Dx9 was put into place and you're stuck with it.
Given the history of the FA Organization, it will never be corrected so if you want it working, you'll have to do as they suggested 6 years ago..."fix it yourself".