Announcement on the banning of Metz

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

Archangelus wrote:QUOTE (Archangelus @ Jul 3 2014, 01:46 AM) Alleg needs more meanie dictators like dome. I really loved the gaming forums where everything was severely moded.

sarcasm detector added.
Oh, for the love of Pook! :P
Image
ryujin
Posts: 3167
Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:17 am

Post by ryujin »

even Elzam's 2 sentence posts are TL;DR for me
*#$@faced $#@!tard Troll
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

Aviation21 wrote:QUOTE (Aviation21 @ Jul 2 2014, 11:48 AM) May I suggest that the RoC apply to mumble!

... and if not already done, state which team voice tool is recommended by Alleg community and that the RoC applies to everyone's conduct on said tool!
If that was the case then you would be banned for physically threatening Viscur.
Image
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

To end this mumble and RoC story...


Q: Why does the ROC apply on Mumble?

A: Mumble (mumble.rtsquad.org or also known as mumble.alleg.net) has become over the years more or less a official alternate communication path within the game. The wiki tells you to get on mumble, training program tells you to get on mumble, in-game people tell you to get on mumble, even Masta, the banned one himself, tells you to get on that specific mumble server.


Q: But mumble is not official owned by FreeAllegiance.org.

A: The same does apply on most of the game servers, but we enforce RoC/ToS there, too. The only difference between mumble and game servers is, that we (@Alleg) control access to these servers while they're connected to the lobby, on mumble we relay on the local server administrator. The server owner can shut down the server or ban anyone he wants and FAO has no influence on that.


Q: Is it easy to enforce?

A: No, that's why BV said years ago he gives a @#(! what happens on mumble, there are no logs like in in-game or forums.


Q: So do you say that breaking the RoC outside of FreeAllegiance (for example facebook) can result in a ban?

A: Yes, in some cases it can lead to an in-game/forum ban. Anyway, we (@Alleg) try to follow the RoC/ToS, but I'm (as representative of server owner) above RoC/ToS.
Last edited by pkk on Fri Jul 04, 2014 8:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Archangelus
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:36 pm
Location: Paradise City

Post by Archangelus »

Pkk why do you even bother?

Just install a dictatorship and put all generals into the field! No prisioners and no interrogations!
pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Jul 18 2014, 06:08 AM) Seems like some people forget, that they're guest here and their status can be removed any time.
ChaoticStorm
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2009 2:38 pm
Location: .

Post by ChaoticStorm »

Archangelus wrote:QUOTE (Archangelus @ Jul 5 2014, 09:01 PM) Pkk why do you even bother?

Just install a dictatorship and put all generals into the field! No prisioners and no interrogations!
This is actually an oligarchy under those who pay for all our game servers webservers and etc pkk is a member of the ruling class but not specifically the head honcho.
Elzam_
Posts: 2242
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:30 pm
Location: Here

Post by Elzam_ »

The moral of this story is, if you're gonna $#@! someone out, do it on your off-site blog or something. Or would you have banned Metz if he posted this stuff on him tumblr blog or something?
A hero is not one who never falls, but one who gets up again and again, NEVER losing sight of one's dream!
Image
Archangelus
Posts: 2376
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 7:36 pm
Location: Paradise City

Post by Archangelus »

ChaoticStorm wrote:QUOTE (ChaoticStorm @ Jul 5 2014, 07:12 PM) This is actually an oligarchy under those who pay for all our game servers webservers and etc pkk is a member of the ruling class but not specifically the head honcho.
The system doesnt matter. The point is, our dictatorship is too soft. Tight the $#@!in cuffs!
pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Jul 18 2014, 06:08 AM) Seems like some people forget, that they're guest here and their status can be removed any time.
MrChaos
Posts: 8352
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by MrChaos »

pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Jul 4 2014, 04:32 AM) To end this mumble and RoC story...


Q: Why does the ROC apply on Mumble?

A: Mumble (mumble.rtsquad.org or also known as mumble.alleg.net) has become over the years more or less a official alternate communication path within the game. The wiki tells you to get on mumble, training program tells you to get on mumble, in-game people tell you to get on mumble, even Masta, the banned one himself, tells you to get on that specific mumble server.


Q: But mumble is not official owned by FreeAllegiance.org.

A: The same does apply on most of the game servers, but we enforce RoC/ToS there, too. The only difference between mumble and game servers is, that we (@Alleg) control access to these servers while they're connected to the lobby, on mumble we relay on the local server administrator. The server owner can shut down the server or ban anyone he wants and FAO has no influence on that.


Q: Is it easy to enforce?

A: No, that's why BV said years ago he gives a @#(! what happens on mumble, there are no logs like in in-game or forums.


Q: So do you say that breaking the RoC outside of FreeAllegiance (for example facebook) can result in a ban?

A: Yes, in some cases it can lead to an in-game/forum ban. Anyway, we (@Alleg) try to follow the RoC/ToS, but I'm (as representative of server owner) above RoC/ToS.
I'm glad to see that the policy has shifted to now "offiicially" include a ban for behavior on Mumble. Well done.

It is my only regret from those days of yore that I listened to others rather than my gut in another Mumble incident as I knew even than the "it isn't part of official Allegiance" was a poor policy choice. If I had Our Man Dome wouldn't had to make this thread... ;)


MrChaos
Ssssh
Gandalf2
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 am
Location: W. Midlands, UK

Post by Gandalf2 »

pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Jul 4 2014, 09:32 AM) To end this mumble and RoC story...


Q: Why does the ROC apply on Mumble?

A: Mumble (mumble.rtsquad.org or also known as mumble.alleg.net) has become over the years more or less a official alternate communication path within the game. The wiki tells you to get on mumble, training program tells you to get on mumble, in-game people tell you to get on mumble, even Masta, the banned one himself, tells you to get on that specific mumble server.


Q: But mumble is not official owned by FreeAllegiance.org.

A: The same does apply on most of the game servers, but we enforce RoC/ToS there, too. The only difference between mumble and game servers is, that we (@Alleg) control access to these servers while they're connected to the lobby, on mumble we relay on the local server administrator. The server owner can shut down the server or ban anyone he wants and FAO has no influence on that.
To add an RT voice to this (as the mumble server is ours)... RT were discussing banning Metz from the mumble server anyway (for many of the same reasons that Dome hit the perma-ban button), but decided not to out of respect to the alleg community & the fact that he was still a major personality here. With him banned from Allegiance I think we went ahead and did what many of us wanted anyway. :P
Image
Image
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
Post Reply