Explosion at Boston marathon

SgtMajor · Post by **SgtMajor** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:52 pm

I can do this all day baby
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Again no military state enforced, no APCs roaming the streets, no "manhunt"

tsubaki_sanjuro · Post by **tsubaki_sanjuro** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:52 pm

HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Apr 19 2013, 11:44 PM) Yup, someone shoots a cop and civil liberties take a power nap

you are talking @#(!e, as usual.

tsubaki_sanjuro · Post by **tsubaki_sanjuro** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:54 pm

SgtMajor wrote:QUOTE (SgtMajor @ Apr 19 2013, 11:52 PM) I can do this all day baby
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklahoma_City_bombing

Again no military state enforced, no APCs roaming the streets, no "manhunt"

you do know that mcveigh was caught by a cop 90 minutes after the bombing, dont you?

SgtMajor · Post by **SgtMajor** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:57 pm

tsubaki_sanjuro wrote:QUOTE (tsubaki_sanjuro @ Apr 19 2013, 04:54 PM) you do know that mcveigh was caught by a cop 90 minutes after the bombing, dont you?

Pulled over for no plate and illegal carry

Nice disinfo

Don't quote that image you are making yourself look bad

SgtMajor · Post by **SgtMajor** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:05 pm

Police scanner in Boston live: Shots fired officers engaging suspect
http://audio4.radioreference.com/732518686

tsubaki_sanjuro · Post by **tsubaki_sanjuro** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:05 pm

SgtMajor wrote:QUOTE (SgtMajor @ Apr 19 2013, 11:57 PM) Pulled over for no plate and illegal carry

Nice disinfo

Don't quote that image you are making yourself look bad

disinfo? LOL

surely even you might be able to realise that the reason they didnt do then what they did now is because mcveigh acted completely differently to these two, and because they had already caught him?

though perhaps you shouldnt think too much

it might hurt your brain

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:08 pm

agri please do not post unless you refer to yourself in the 3rd person at least once per post

SgtMajor · Post by **SgtMajor** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:09 pm

tsubaki_sanjuro wrote:QUOTE (tsubaki_sanjuro @ Apr 19 2013, 05:05 PM) disinfo? LOL

surely even you might be able to realise that the reason they didnt do then what they did now is because mcveigh acted completely differently to these two, and because they had already caught him?

though perhaps you shouldnt think too much

it might hurt your brain

Getting a bit rougher with the words there mate, my point is that there was no manhunt in the WTC bombing EITHER.

What I meant by disinfo is that you were attempting to imply that there was a hunt out for Mcveigh and he was caught quickly due to some sort of governmental or city wide effort.

tsubaki_sanjuro · Post by **tsubaki_sanjuro** » Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:14 pm

SgtMajor wrote:QUOTE (SgtMajor @ Apr 20 2013, 12:09 AM) Getting a bit rougher with the words there mate, my point is that there was no manhunt in the WTC bombing EITHER.

What I meant by disinfo is that you were attempting to imply that there was a hunt out for Mcveigh and he was caught quickly due to some sort of governmental or city wide effort.

rough words are deserved, and agri blatantly wasnt trying to suggest that there was a hunt for mcveigh - he was pointing out that there wasnt a hunt BECAUSE THEY HAD ALREADY CAUGHT HIM. also there wasnt a hunt for the WTC 93 bombers BECAUSE THEY DID NOT DO WHAT THESE SUSPECTS DID, and also because the FBI knew who they were.

if he / they had shot a couple of cops and threatened to carry out further attacks, there might well have been a hunt. with apcs and everything!