Can we change stack rating column or add new column that reflects stack per game.
As far as I understand it right now stack rating is comulative. I think it would reflect how much people stack if it were per game. i.e stack rating divided by games played.
Am I getting this wrong? because to me it seems like the raw number that appears now has no relevance.
New column for leaderboard please
The stack rating doesn't reflect how people stack.
It only indicates that the individual was on a stacked team. There is no distinction made as to whether the player joined a team making it stacked or was already on a balanced team where others then joined and made that team stacked.
It only indicates that the individual was on a stacked team. There is no distinction made as to whether the player joined a team making it stacked or was already on a balanced team where others then joined and made that team stacked.
[15:25] <BBT_> oh, so da vinci's mona lisa isn't his work?
[15:25] <+fuh-zz> No, he simply put effort into it.
[15:25] <BBT_> are you really that retarded?
[15:25] <+fuh-zz> No, he simply put effort into it.
[15:25] <BBT_> are you really that retarded?
What I'm saying is that no matter how you look at it, the stack rating is meaningless.
If a player has a high stack rating with few games played, you can not conclude that he stacks, is stacked, or just coincidentally on the stacked team.
On the other hand, if a player has high stack rating with many games played, you can not conclude he is a stacker or is being stacked because of his popularity.
If a player has a high stack rating with few games played, you can not conclude that he stacks, is stacked, or just coincidentally on the stacked team.
On the other hand, if a player has high stack rating with many games played, you can not conclude he is a stacker or is being stacked because of his popularity.
[15:25] <BBT_> oh, so da vinci's mona lisa isn't his work?
[15:25] <+fuh-zz> No, he simply put effort into it.
[15:25] <BBT_> are you really that retarded?
[15:25] <+fuh-zz> No, he simply put effort into it.
[15:25] <BBT_> are you really that retarded?
-
Rand0m_Numb3r
- Posts: 1338
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:00 am
- Location: Madison, Wisconsin