sysx vs ni

Tactical advice, How-to, Post-mortem, etc.
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

IC hvy ints vs rix reg ints (which have dmg/range perk) is not at all an auto-win engagement - especially when our top whores didn't even show up to the game.
Why would it have mattered if we had hvy ints earlier when everyone was just disintegrating in prox2 fields, anyway?
Last edited by Mastametz on Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's a new sheriff in town.
Buyo
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:31 pm

Post by Buyo »

Ok, let's say fair enough.

If IC heavy ints vs rix regs is not an auto-win engagement, I'm pretty sure letting us mine to heavies was a worse idea.
Make Allegiance Great Again
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

Letting anyone mine is always a bad idea. We would have lost more miners without the sup and probably wouldn't have killed any more miners having hvy ints a bit sooner.
hvy ints die to prox2 just like the rest of em
There's a new sheriff in town.
Buyo
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:31 pm

Post by Buyo »

You just don't wanna see that SUP gave you nothing that game, the only thing that sup gave you was figbees and galvs which were not useful because you got them after heavy ints, you did exp -> sup (which gave you nothing) -> adv exp -> adv sup, I'm sure if you had done exp -> adv. exp -> sup/tac/sy the game would have been different.

It's an honest advice.
Make Allegiance Great Again
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

sup gave us a controlled sector for 5k over the cost of an OP and the ability to retain boost2 (which is great for ints on miner O, especially since the fuel nerf), and to research rip1 and hull1 (which are invaluable for ripping miners)
sup paid for itself
if you want to criticize an expenditure you might consider that I bought cm2 for no reason?
ic exp/sup is always amazing, and galvs/figbees were perfectly acceptable

and we never really mined with "no problems". at one point they were docked for a bit while your opening rush was hanging out in our home, and after that the miners were constantly being ripped around for the rest of the game (with some lost miners that had to be replaced - those cost money)
Last edited by Mastametz on Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's a new sheriff in town.
Buyo
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:31 pm

Post by Buyo »

Make Allegiance Great Again
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

You're the type of person that would buy an opening op and tele, then an exp, then dump 30k into adv exp so you end up with mini1 hvy ints with no GAs, no boost2, no map control, and wonder why you didn't auto-win the game. Get real.
There's a new sheriff in town.
Buyo
Posts: 907
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:31 pm

Post by Buyo »

Well, I think all the community can see the main reason NI didn't win at least.
Make Allegiance Great Again
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

The community's never been able to see any reasons for anything.

p.s. I'm pretty sure nobody from Brazil has ever been good at this game
Last edited by Mastametz on Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's a new sheriff in town.
NightRychune
Posts: 3065
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:00 am

Post by NightRychune »

lol buyo
Post Reply