QUOTE "It may be pointless to try to establish which World War Two Axis aggressor, Germany or Japan, was the more brutal to the peoples it victimised. The Germans killed six million Jews and 20 million Russians (i.e. Soviet citizens); the Japanese slaughtered as many as 30 million Filipinos, Malays, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Indonesians and Burmese, at least 23 million of them ethnic Chinese. Both nations looted the countries they conquered on a monumental scale, though Japan plundered more, over a longer period, than the Nazis. Both conquerors enslaved millions and exploited them as forced labourers—and, in the case of the Japanese, as (forced) prostitutes for front-line troops. If you were a Nazi prisoner of war from Britain, America, Australia, New Zealand or Canada (but not the Soviet Union) you faced a 4% chance of not surviving the war; (by comparison) the death rate for Allied POWs held by the Japanese was nearly 30%.[/quote]
The stakes were pretty high in World War 2, we did kill a lot of Japaneese civilians between the bombing and subsequent nuclear bombing, but Japan was being held hostage by the Military. Even the Emperor (their literal immortal God), wouldnt overrule his cabinet.
Additionally, Asia was being plundered and many millions of Chineese were being slaughtered every few months, it had to end. We did what we had to.
So adept, 100,000 Japaneese casualties (from the bombing) or several million more innocent Asians? (letting japan survive longer means more dead Asians)