*SheriffMetz@NI (IC Exp) vs *Idanmel@RT (Belters Tac/SY)
Limited Diamond
Med-Med Very Scare
Friendly Fire On
-NI shows 19 (zomg)
-NI goes high (eich), RT goes low (thrale), cons plant fine
-NI takes low (palain) tp near U rock, low next to its home
-RT takes high (ploor) tp near high aleph
-RT begins attempting to bomb low, is proxed to death on aleph entry several times
-RT is able to bomb NI high op while NI is on miner o low
-NI sends a new op high and it plants
-NI gets Exp
-RT continues to bomb, eventually gets Tac in delgon
-RT is able to bomb NI high op from its tp in yavin
-NI sends a new op high and it plants
-RT stealth fighters begin getting annoying, kill some miners
-NI mini2 ints start killing RT miners
-At some point Botzman kills a teleport con with some other NI while rest is on miner o
-NI bombs RT low op, yavin tp, and helios tp
-NI plants an op in yavin, at this point Ryu points out that game stats says RT is 60 / NI 40. They have a shipyard!
-NI sends huge bomb team to RT tac and destroys it along with a destroyer
-RT is reduced to their home sector, garrison and shipyard
-RT keep killing our miners and tango questions, "why does it seem like they have an endless supply of stealth fighters?" laughs on mumble ensue
-Finally NI heavy ints and mini3 come online, we destroy a total of 5 destroyers, push an op to RT home, bomb and win
Very fun game. Thanks RT.
NI vs RT
-
One-Man-Bucket
- Posts: 1248
- Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2005 7:00 am
I drove the bomber on the tac, RT had parked a carrier so close to the aleph that it was impossible to enter with the bomber. I went in at 1mps, but since you get some momentum when you exit an aleph bomber just bounced back in again. Could only enter after carrier was dead.
To me that feels like an exploit, and should be patched!
To me that feels like an exploit, and should be patched!
lmao. i know exactly whose idea that wasOne-Man-Bucket wrote:QUOTE (One-Man-Bucket @ Oct 14 2012, 05:58 PM) I drove the bomber on the tac, RT had parked a carrier so close to the aleph that it was impossible to enter with the bomber. I went in at 1mps, but since you get some momentum when you exit an aleph bomber just bounced back in again. Could only enter after carrier was dead.
To me that feels like an exploit, and should be patched!
JimmyNighthawk wrote:QUOTE (JimmyNighthawk @ Jun 30 2013, 11:32 PM) "Bavarian Sausage Anti-Ketchup Soap"[*]
yeah that was some cute @#(!
belter bomb, carrier aleph defense
hah
hah
ha
belter bomb, carrier aleph defense
hah
hah
ha
QUOTE Once engaged 13 and a half Dreg Heavy Ints (at the same time) with an IC Int and emerged in a heavy int with 2 mini 3 and 1 mini dis and all foes destroyed
--- QUOTE (spideycw @ Apr 1 2009, 01:53 PM) Definition of wtfpwn: Weedman in an int[/quote]
Lordus Weedicus II•Uses TS but can be difficult to understand due to the fact has never been sober•Expert int whore (without non-standard use of strafe buttons)•Gains skill increase when playing with Aarmstrong or former members of TRA•Expert miner D (ability to aim)•Can be trusted to run your economy•One of the half dozen or so game changers•Average Stacker
--- QUOTE (spideycw @ Apr 1 2009, 01:53 PM) Definition of wtfpwn: Weedman in an int[/quote]
Lordus Weedicus II•Uses TS but can be difficult to understand due to the fact has never been sober•Expert int whore (without non-standard use of strafe buttons)•Gains skill increase when playing with Aarmstrong or former members of TRA•Expert miner D (ability to aim)•Can be trusted to run your economy•One of the half dozen or so game changers•Average Stacker
Very scarce (no home he3, 2 He3 per other sector) med total money, treasures off. RT couldn't have mined out more than... 4 cumulative rocks/2 cumulative sectors and afforded what...~5 miners, ~4 tele cons, 1 OP con, 1 carrier, bombers + the price per bomber as they lost bombers all game, plus a garrison upgrade, tac+sfs+tac basics, a sy+hk2+6 dests
Does this sound about right?
I don't play belters, someone add those costs up for me
and I especially liked the part where (xjammer's?) SF rammed our low op con so hard it knocked it completely off the rock - it had not quite lined up yet but it probably would have prevented it from building even if it had, that's how far it launched the con
Does this sound about right?
I don't play belters, someone add those costs up for me
and I especially liked the part where (xjammer's?) SF rammed our low op con so hard it knocked it completely off the rock - it had not quite lined up yet but it probably would have prevented it from building even if it had, that's how far it launched the con
Last edited by Mastametz on Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
There's a new sheriff in town.
-
qqmwoarplox
- Posts: 1647
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:18 pm
-
TheCorsair
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:32 pm
- Location: Сою́з Сове́тски
Would have been nice for more RT to show up and on time and I didn't have to sit out but thanks for the game RT. I was almost late for Kremlin business and lucky Stalin wasn't there.
"Neither east nor west" 
UNITED FOREVER IN FRIENDSHIP AND LABOUR
"The clouds are fleeting over every country, we stand fast, for no kind of rain will take away our smiles."

UNITED FOREVER IN FRIENDSHIP AND LABOUR
"The clouds are fleeting over every country, we stand fast, for no kind of rain will take away our smiles."




