Creationism and science?

Camaro · Post by **Camaro** » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:53 pm

The two main US parties encompass 3rd parties.

Republican's, for instance, are made up of about 5-15% Libertarians... people who disagree with Social Conservatives and war, but agree with Fiscal Conservatism. I am sure that there are also Libertarians who are members of the Democratic party as well, who value liberal social positions more and are willing to put up with Democrat's less than conservative fiscal position (not that Republicans are really any better in this regard).

The make-up of these two parties is constantly changing over time because of this.

That is the idea of the "big tent" party.

Our two parties are like the alliances in other countries.

SumVeritas · Post by **SumVeritas** » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:02 pm

on topic¿?

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:55 pm

Camaro wrote:QUOTE (Camaro @ Aug 8 2012, 04:53 PM) Our two parties are like the alliances in other countries.

voting allianced? We get that sometimes, like small nationalist and religious parties joining forces so they can get a few more members into the parlament between themselves, even though they disagree on almost everything politically. It's a dirty business and much frowned upon. If you meant coalitions as in coalition governments, then I think they are not much like them at all

Camaro · Post by **Camaro** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:18 am

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Aug 8 2012, 12:55 PM) voting allianced? We get that sometimes, like small nationalist and religious parties joining forces so they can get a few more members into the parlament between themselves, even though they disagree on almost everything politically. It's a dirty business and much frowned upon. If you meant coalitions as in coalition governments, then I think they are not much like them at all

Right sorry, I meant coalition.

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:59 am

Alien51 wrote:QUOTE (Alien51 @ Aug 7 2012, 04:13 PM) http://www.justfacts.com/

Nice site.

yea....

The mammoths frozen in Ice came from this "little Ice age"??!!??
It makes it hard to present historical evidence in terms of climate when you think the world is 4000 years old...

I like this site better:

wikipedia.org

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:44 am

http://www.evilbible.com/

this amuses me

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:00 pm

NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Aug 9 2012, 08:44 AM) http://www.evilbible.com/

this amuses me

Damn straight, except I'm more like horrified. Still, I know exactly what you mean. Religion of love my foot!

qqmwoarplox · Post by **qqmwoarplox** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:08 pm

lol Adept the above site is just as stupid as the previous one

Adept · Post by **Adept** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:35 pm

qqqqqq wrote:QUOTE (qqqqqq @ Aug 9 2012, 06:08 PM) lol Adept the above site is just as stupid as the previous one

Thing is k10, I picked up a bible a few years back, and started reading it in earnest. The misogynism and justification for genocidal violence in the Old Testament sickened and horrified me. I can't believe that book is considered "good" by anybody.

qqmwoarplox · Post by **qqmwoarplox** » Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:08 pm

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Aug 9 2012, 10:35 AM) Thing is k10, I picked up a bible a few years back, and started reading it in earnest. The misogynism and justification for genocidal violence in the Old Testament sickened and horrified me. I can't believe that book is considered "good" by anybody.

thing is you cant "just" pick up a bible and read it.