Creationism and science?

Non-Allegiance related. High probability of spam. Pruned regularly.
germloucks
Posts: 756
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Seattle

Post by germloucks »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jun 20 2012, 01:57 AM) Guys, is it really so terrible that someone wants to accept science and believe in God? Would you rather Cam was a biblical literalist? I know I wouldn't.

Live and let live, so long as the philosophy is not dangerous or anti-science.
Thats a little like saying, "Well at least he isn't eating his own feces, it could be worse" Id rather say that we appreciate the progress, but still lots of room for improvement. :biggrin:
Last edited by germloucks on Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Gandalf2
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 am
Location: W. Midlands, UK

Post by Gandalf2 »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jun 20 2012, 09:57 AM) The Bible tells us that it's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven.

People in the western world are rich both in comparison to the rest of the world or in comparison to people in Jesus' time.

Therefore, according to the literal truth of the Bible all people in the western world are going to hell.

Is there any given solution for this particular problem? Or do you just accept that you're going to hell (in which case why bother with church)?
If you're really interested in the answer, how about I give you the quote in context, and you see if you can give an answer? You've asked enough questions and read enough threads over the years that you should have some understanding.
NIV wrote:16 Just then a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life ?”

17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, keep the commandments.”

18 “Which ones?” he inquired.

Jesus replied, “‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, 19 honor your father and mother,’[c] and ‘love your neighbor as yourself.’[d]”

20 “All these I have kept,” the young man said. “What do I still lack?”

21 Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

22 When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

23 Then Jesus said to his disciples, “Truly I tell you, it is hard for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of heaven. 24 Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.”

25 When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?”

26 Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
Image
Image
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
takingarms1
Posts: 3052
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:00 am

Post by takingarms1 »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jun 20 2012, 04:57 AM) Guys, is it really so terrible that someone wants to accept science and believe in God? Would you rather Cam was a biblical literalist? I know I wouldn't.

Live and let live, so long as the philosophy is not dangerous or anti-science.

A quick question for Alien, or any other biblical literalist though:

The Bible tells us that it's easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven.

People in the western world are rich both in comparison to the rest of the world or in comparison to people in Jesus' time.

Therefore, according to the literal truth of the Bible all people in the western world are going to hell.

Is there any given solution for this particular problem? Or do you just accept that you're going to hell (in which case why bother with church)?
Sigh. There are so many more intelligent ways to criticize the Bible. You really don't have to resort to straw man nonsense like this.
"You give my regards to St. Peter. Or, whoever has his job, but in hell!"
- - - -
fuzzylunkin1

Post by fuzzylunkin1 »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jun 20 2012, 03:57 AM) Guys, is it really so terrible that someone wants to accept science and believe in God? Would you rather Cam was a biblical literalist? I know I wouldn't.

Live and let live, so long as the philosophy is not dangerous or anti-science.
No, I don't actually have any problem with it, myself. Accept for one tiny detail: Accepting the idea of a deity in place of science keeps some uber-genii from discovering some things easily within their grasp.

Really, I can't say it better than my man Neil deGrasse Tyson.

EDIT:
Yeah, I know I link to this dude a lot :lol: .
Last edited by fuzzylunkin1 on Wed Jun 20, 2012 10:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Camaro wrote:QUOTE (Camaro @ Jun 20 2012, 10:52 PM) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoqSas2uFKw
Pretty good modern version of a creation myth. :thumbsup:
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
grarrgrarr
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 3:07 am

Post by grarrgrarr »

Hi, I just discovered this thread and what caught my attention is the discussion is at a somewhat higher level than the common faith vs. atheist discussion on the internet. I will probably share my views and perhaps it could give you a deeper insight to the nature of Christianity as prescribed by scripture.

I have been professing the Christian faith for about 6 years. However, I would consider to have met God only slightly over a year ago. In light of my new discoveries as I have grown in my faith, I could hardly consider myself being a real Christian during the first 5 years of my "official" status as Christian. Now I am glad that my life has changed for the better. However, it might surprise you that the stiffest critics to my faith are none other than the dogmatic Christians who by worldly standards are more educated in the christian faith.

Previously, as a professing christian, I knew some of the teachings in the bible, as well as the orthodox doctrine as defined by the church. However, I was not fully convinced that God was truly what people consider him to be. After all, if the existence of God was easily proven, then this debate wouldn't have existed in the first place.

However, all that started to change with my first supernatural encounter with God. During a session of prayer and worship, I was given two visions one after the other. Although it is impossible to describe with words exactly how the experience was like, it was like a vivid dream, yet without losing consciousness. I saw perhaps 10 seconds of total "video", but after the encounter ended, it seemed like the 10 seconds took almost no time in the sense of "real" seconds.

In the first vision, I saw a short scene of my family in the hall, and we had a peace and joy within the family unlike what I had previously experienced. In the second vision, I saw myself in the corridor outside my apartment doing some woodworking. Do note that this was my first experience of this sort, and I was yet to be convinced of God in a way that I am now. Initially I had a positive reaction to the first vision because what was presented to me was not something undesirable. However, I was skeptical about the second vision, because woodworking is considered to be something for the lowest classes of workers. Now, there could be other opinions about the source of these visions. At the time, I decided to give God the benefit of the doubt and plucked up my faith, resulting in action.

I am from Singapore, and we have a stressful education system, which had caused very poor relations within my family. My father was a teacher, and had very high expectations of me. What made the matter worse, was that I was streamed into a special "Gifted Education Programme" meant for students who have passed a few rounds of tests to show exceptional cognitive abilities. Such a course was designed to be challenging enough to maximize one's potential. Unfortunately, among the group, I consistently ranked among the bottom few, failing a high percentage of my exams. This drove my dad mad, although to me, given a more enlightened perspective, his reaction was unnecessary. Hypothetically, if a student was admitted to the University of Cambridge, and performs poorly in his course of study, does that mean the student is lacking potential? The mere fact of admission to such a university speaks for the student's capabilities.

At the time, I was studying in the main local university. What I saw in my vision led me to take a decision to withdraw from my studies, to spend more quality time with my family. Surprisingly, my dad was agreeable to it. Although he was not a Christian, he took the stand that if I believed that it was a decision based on God, he would be okay with it. Now this decision was with heavy criticism from all sides, the most disconcerting of which were Christians trying to use scripture out of context to show how I was being irresponsible in this decision. Some claimed that the improvement of family relations was not mutually exclusive with the pursuit of a degree, and some others claimed that it was not to be pursued at the cost of academic qualifications. To me, given the heavy workload of my course of study, it was one or the other.

Of course, by spending the next months with the sole purpose of being with my family, it is no surprise that the relationship improved greatly. It was also the first time in my life where I had the time to focus my study on biblical scripture to learn more about the nature of God. Alongside my development of my cognitive understanding of God according to the bible, is also a more confident spiritual relationship with God. This against hard to describe with words, but to me it is similar to a gut feeling, but yet with confidence because it resonates with my knowledge of God, and supported by my cognitive understanding of scripture.

Over this period, God was bringing me through different phases of personal character development, and there came a point where I felt that God was bringing me into a new phase of holding responsibility. Of course, I had my own ideas of what that could possibly be, but what turned out to be totally unexpected, yet on hind sight totally seems to make sense. God told me to go on a fast. This was the first time I had done so in my life (other than for the sake of some blood test/donation). On the fifth day of my fast, a piece of scripture caught my eye, and it somehow resonated with my perception of my father (link). He was into new age philosophy and claimed to have a greater revelation of God, often using out-of-context bible scripture to attack the Christian faith, yet showing no character improvement that one would normally associate with somebody claiming to be close to God. Although there was a striking resemblance, I did not pay attention to it. However, later on in the afternoon I received a phone call from my mother that my dad was not well. I rushed back to find that he was showing symptoms of a stroke, and called the ambulance. The hemorrhagic stroke was so severe, that before reaching the hospital he was already fully incapacitated. He was put on life support, but subsequently even that failed to sustain his body and was declared dead 3 days later.

Now, many people consider it to be a great tragedy in my life. However, what amazed me is that after I did an objective evaluation of my life up till then, I was never better prepared for such an event. I am the only child, and my mother is a dependent due to health issues. Had I continued my studies, I would not have learnt how to operate in a healthy family environment, and would not have learnt as much about my mother's needs. It could have possibly disrupted my studies anyway, with the difference being I was totally unprepared for such a situation. Excluding the consideration of delaying the death of my father till a later time, you could say that I could not have been in any better position than that time to handle such an event. The supernatural thing is that the reason why I was in such a position was because I had decided to act by faith on a vision which I had chosen to assume that it was from God.

I also have a hobby in music production, and was participating in an electronic music interest group in the university. To cut a long story short(er), as a result of my free time I was able to explore more in this field and improve my technical capabilities and knowledge. I ended up having to do woodworking in my corridor as part of the initial phase of my journey in this direction. Even now, sometimes I still have to do some DIY manufacturing outside my corridor. The skills I was able to pick up is in high demand and in short supply in my geographical region, and due to the high positive market response thus far, starting a business seemed to be the best choice to make. I am glad to say that I am still being able to sustain my operation thus far without spending a cent on marketing. At any point in time there are either committed projects or many sales leads. In the process, I have learn so much more than I would have if I had chosen to continue my academic course. Through this process I have been able to improve my skills and knowledge in building, interior design, electro-acoustics, sales, business management, and most importantly living a life as a follower of Jesus.

Evaluating my career path quantitatively, God has led me to exchange a 4 year course which would have costed in the region of $70000 dollars in total cost incurred, to (thus far) a 1 year journey which is already generating revenue for me. All because I had chosen to act by faith on a vision which I had attributed to be divine.

Now, I can choose to either believe that God truly exists, and truly is looking out for me according to the promises as described in the bible, or my entire experience is a combination of delusion and coincidence. Everybody has his/her own right to take either stand, but to me the sequence of events is sufficient to convince me to believe in God.


I strongly believe in the scientific method when applied in order to find the truth. I see that some Christians are anti-science because they are afraid that scientific discoveries will (and already have) shatter the dogmas considered to be pillars of the Christian faith. However, perhaps these Christians don't really believe in God, but merely subscribe to the theological and dogmatic structure as given by the church? If God is really the creator, and the supreme being, then shouldn't he be in control of the situation? To fight against science only shows the lack of confidence in God being who God is supposed to be. In addition, if one was truly practicing the faith as Jesus has taught in the bible, you wouldn't frustrate the logical minded by baseless arguments. Some Christians I have come across have said that you can't have a deep relationship with God being logically minded. However, my opinion is that to take that stand you either don't understand God, or you don't understand what logic is. The key to a logical approach for somebody who wants to live a life following Jesus, is to simply replace the premises as assumed by the world, with the premises as promised in scripture. With the new premises in place, following sound reasoning would result in the logical (but supernatural) results.

On the other hand, the scientific method can be, and has been widely abused when the core intention is not in search of the truth. Numerous food and drug safety incidents have been caused by "science" proving the safety of etc etc.. However, this is not a failure of science, but the wickedness of men driven by greed. The methodology and conclusions were twisted and distorted for the sake of biasing the apparent result in favor of proving the safety of a particular drug. This is not even a close-kept secret, as one can easily find a large amount of official information regarding these events.

From the perspective of creationism vs. atheism, I take all arguments with a pinch of salt because the core intention is not to find the truth, but only to support a view which one is already convinced of. Even if one would want to try to remain neutral, it is difficult to avoid unconscious bias in selecting your sources. If one would want to find the truth, he/she would have to try to fully understand BOTH sides of the argument, and try to filter out any inaccurate sources by following sound academic methods.

It is sad but true, that in this case, the creationists are more guilty of bending facts and misrepresentation in order to defend their viewpoint, which is what appears to me to be a traditional understanding which should be revised or appended to in light of new scientific discoveries. If God is the supreme creator, and he created (some of) us with an intellectual mind, how can exercising this gift threaten his own existence? I believe in developing an understanding where God and Science not just co-exists but work towards convergence, because God is ultimately the creator of science.
Image
BackTrak
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:52 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by BackTrak »

If an atheist believes in the teachings of Christ, living according to the bible but they do not believe in god and only thinks of Christ as a really good guy and an excellent role model...

Are they still damned?

:unsure:

If so, why?
ImageImage
fuzzylunkin1

Post by fuzzylunkin1 »

That was a nice, well-written post, garrgarr. Thanks for sharing. You are a great example of someone who can keep their faith and logic separate.

A couple of things I was thinking to say, though: 1) It's not, at least not for me, Atheism vs Creationism but rather Creationism vs Science, or even, in some aspects, Religion vs Science. 2) One who truly follows the scientific method is pretty damn neutral. That's all I ask of anyone. The best way for a scientist to find the truth is to admit they don't know and keep searching.

EDIT:
BackTrak wrote:QUOTE (BackTrak @ Jun 20 2012, 10:46 PM) If an atheist believes in the teachings of Christ, living according to the bible but they do not believe in god and only thinks of Christ as a really good guy and an excellent role model...

Are they still damned?

:unsure:

If so, why?
Yes, because they are heretics! :lol: Seriously, accepting the most useful parts of religion and rejecting the least useful? I'd send that man to heaven just for using the gift I gave him logically and intelligently.

That's what I like to think about myself; if there is a god and a heaven, hell, etc blah blah blah, I think it would bre proud of me for using its gift properly.
Last edited by fuzzylunkin1 on Thu Jun 21, 2012 5:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gandalf2
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 am
Location: W. Midlands, UK

Post by Gandalf2 »

BackTrak wrote:QUOTE (BackTrak @ Jun 21 2012, 04:46 AM) If an atheist believes in the teachings of Christ, living according to the bible but they do not believe in god and only thinks of Christ as a really good guy and an excellent role model...

Are they still damned?
This is not a possible scenario. Half of what Jesus tought was about God and heaven, and who he was. It's impossible to believe the teachings of Christ and not believe in God.
Image
Image
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Gandalf2 wrote:QUOTE (Gandalf2 @ Jun 21 2012, 10:48 AM) This is not a possible scenario. Half of what Jesus tought was about God and heaven, and who he was. It's impossible to believe the teachings of Christ and not believe in God.
Ignore the belief bit. What about good action without belief. Say, thinking about jesus as a normal human role model, and living an exemplary life... But without faith.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Post Reply