Horrible story about the NYPD

Non-Allegiance related. High probability of spam. Pruned regularly.
MrChaos
Posts: 8352
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by MrChaos »

DonKarnage wrote:QUOTE (DonKarnage @ Feb 15 2012, 12:44 AM) So what's worse, quietly being amused of a man wearing a dress, or making someone feel like a total immature piece of @#(! for showing amusement of such a thing?
Im going with being Weylin
Ssssh
Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

Welp, this turned progressively more depressing.
Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

Santorum levels of hatassery.

"I'm sorry, if you have a penis, you're attracted to women. If you have a vagina, you are attracted to men. If you claim otherwise, you have a mental disorder. That's how I see it. It's nothing to be ashamed of, just as there is no shame in having any other health issue. It's a biological mandate. This country is going to hell in a handbasket. At one point do we draw the line between "choice" and "mental disease?" If a person claims he's attracted to ducks, do we then set up legislature to let him marry ducks? girly, you're gonna say that this is SO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT and berate me for being a closed minded, insensitive jerk. But before you do, answer this: Why is a man being attracted to other men different from a man being attracted to ducks?"

Try to see what several separate things are wrong with the above, and maybe you'll be able to logically derive what's wrong with your original statement, too!

Or maybe not! I don't know.

"Why is the man not a duck? Because he doesn't look like a duck? Because he is, in fact, a man? Because being a duck instead of a man isn't a choice?" Sometimes it is indeed very hard to tell the difference between human beings and various species of fowl.

Now I need to go look at some videos of adorable puppies or something for an hour.
Last edited by Makida on Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

DonKarnage wrote:QUOTE (DonKarnage @ Feb 15 2012, 07:44 AM) So what's worse, quietly being amused of a man wearing a dress, or making someone feel like a total immature piece of @#(! for showing amusement of such a thing?
For Cthulhu's sake man, get your foot out of your mouth! :doh:
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

girlyboy wrote:QUOTE (girlyboy @ Feb 15 2012, 03:31 PM) Santorum levels of hatassery.

"I'm sorry, if you have a penis, you're attracted to women. If you have a vagina, you are attracted to men. If you claim otherwise, you have a mental disorder. That's how I see it. It's nothing to be ashamed of, just as there is no shame in having any other health issue. It's a biological mandate. This country is going to hell in a handbasket. At one point do we draw the line between "choice" and "mental disease?" If a person claims he's attracted to ducks, do we then set up legislature to let him marry ducks? girly, you're gonna say that this is SO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT and berate me for being a closed minded, insensitive jerk. But before you do, answer this: Why is a man being attracted to other men different from a man being attracted to ducks?"
Are you suggesting that a man attracted to ducks can legitimately be called quackers?




Sorry.
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
DonKarnage
Posts: 545
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:18 pm

Post by DonKarnage »

:o did I say something wrong?
It is Karnage! Don Karnage! Roll the r!
BackTrak
Posts: 2079
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 4:52 am
Location: Chicago, IL
Contact:

Post by BackTrak »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 15 2012, 10:29 AM) Are you suggesting that a man attracted to ducks can legitimately be called quackers?




Sorry.
What are you talking about, Rav? I cannard-ly make it out.
ImageImage
MrChaos
Posts: 8352
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by MrChaos »

DonKarnage wrote:QUOTE (DonKarnage @ Feb 15 2012, 04:42 PM) :o did I say something wrong?

Duh
Ssssh
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

DK, what you did is called "blaming the victim".

Basically you were making light of what the cops were doing by describing it as (or drawing a parallel with)
QUOTE quietly being amused of a man wearing a dress"[/quote]

And then turning it around with this
QUOTE or making someone feel like a total immature piece of @#(! for showing amusement of such a thing?[/quote]
Which sounds like you're suggesting the behavior of the cops (quietly amused were they?) was all natural and normal, and people are being mean to them by thinking they should feel bad about such.


***

I hope that's not what you meant, but that's roughly how it comes across.
Last edited by Adept on Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Vortrog
Posts: 1902
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia

Post by Vortrog »

In my mind, DK will be handcuffed for 28 hours while Adept of the BTVPD makes snide remarks and giggles on.
Image
Post Reply