Free Allegiance Forums

HSharp · Post by **HSharp** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:03 pm

It's ok k10 you can't help who you are.

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:17 pm

Elzam V. Branstein wrote:QUOTE (Elzam V. Branstein @ Aug 18 2011, 08:55 AM) Alien's great wisdom in suggesting that we use carriers to FB is clearly the answer.

Clearly. It's not boring, and it would be harder too.

Zero_Falcon wrote:QUOTE (Zero_Falcon @ Aug 18 2011, 10:13 AM) Applies only to Belters since mass was reduced. Outside that ships handle the same. (Giga still has poor turn torque afaik)

http://www.freeallegiance.org/FAW/index.php/XC

"All levels of fighters: Returned to DN 00.04.60 scale levels. Mass reduced to 24 [36]"
"Seeker 1: Mass reduced to .75 per missile [1]"

Ya that's not much, but I guess it was enough to where I could feel it.
Also...
"This will give Supremacy a unique booster development path and also improve their overall speed enough so that fighters through all stages of the game have significantly less trouble dealing with pesky scouts and are better able to engage targets at range. This change amounts to a 50-80mps gain on accessible top-end booster speed depending on the level of fighter and a faction’s inherent speed attribute."

Zero_Falcon wrote:QUOTE (Zero_Falcon @ Aug 18 2011, 10:13 AM) You all know me, I hate missiles (I actually shoot better when I ignore the seeker missile locks... Because I can't divide my attention between shooting and missile locking enough...)

But

Before XC: DFs and Seekers pack punches
In XC: DFs and Seekers pack punches
QFs: My knowledge and experience lacking, so no comment

"Seeker 1: Damage increased to 70 [60] Lock radius increased to .33333"
"Seeker 2: Cost reduced to $2500"
"XRM/XRP AB 1: Damage increased to 120 [78]"
"MRM Quickfires: Switched to DM04 [DM14]"
"LRM Killer 1: Damage increased to 150 [120]"

Now they pack more punches and are easier to use.

Zero_Falcon wrote:QUOTE (Zero_Falcon @ Aug 18 2011, 10:13 AM) I like sniping bbr nans with my stl (shooting at 900m without zooming in isn't going to do you (or at least me) any good, because you're supposed to be sniping...), figs are supposed to be the Jack Of All Trades and ints are still awesome defenders.

Fyi figs are the cross of ints and stls, as a single fig is often enough to solo a miner/con QUICKLY enough before d comes to it (almost as efficient as SFs) and also being able to take on the role of base defense.

On the subject of utl o... go cashto!

"Tactical: All equipment research costs have been decreased to 3750"
"EW Sniper 1: Damage increased to 44/second [28/s]"
"EW Sniper 1: Damage reduced to 40/s [44]"
"Small Shield 1/2/3: Hitpoints increased by 40 at each level."
"Small Shield 1: Signature reduced to .3 [.5]"

These changes (and the missiles above) enable sfs and figs to hold their own against ints.
Also you really don't need to zoom while using sniper.

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Aug 18 2011, 10:44 AM) Well everyone's given up on giving you reasons because you ignore them so very dutifully. If you actually bothered to read what MW said and think about it for a second or two (no, I don't expect this to happen), you'd have noticed that he referred to you in the third person rather than the second. Therefore he was talking about you, not to you. Your rampant egocentricism merely assumed that he was talking to you. What MW was actually saying could be rewritten something like this:

After reading my post, he made a point to share his unsupported opinion that my post was wrong. And that I am an idiot. If this wasn't directed at me, then it is nothing but slander; because he was not participating in the discussion. And you get mad at me because of...?

Who cares if it wasn't directed to me, I'll still respond to it and defend my position; to an extent. Otherwise I'll look like a pussy who takes your @#(!.

lexaal · Post by **lexaal** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 5:26 pm

k10xbai wrote:QUOTE (k10xbai @ Aug 18 2011, 05:03 PM) wat

You mean coitus?

Seymor · Post by **Seymor** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:43 pm

I like how besides night and raveen, nobody has posted in this thread whose opinion I give a @#(! about. This thread is literally at least 80% @#(!.

Just an observation.

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 7:49 pm

Seymor wrote:QUOTE (Seymor @ Aug 18 2011, 03:43 PM) I like how besides night and raveen, nobody has posted in this thread whose opinion I give a @#(! about. This thread is literally at least 80% @#(!.

Just an observation.

You like how there's people you don't like talking about something?

DasSmiter · Post by **DasSmiter** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:28 pm

I'm just saying all the worst kind of voobs seem to love the @#(! out of XC

Post by **Raveen** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 8:39 pm

Wait Seymor gives a @#(! about my opinion? He must be mental. Oh yeah, that Seymor.

Psychosis · Post by **Psychosis** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 9:26 pm

if XC is pissing you off, its because it's doing it right, $#@!off and let XT run the cores like you should have all along.

Zero_Falcon · Post by **Zero_Falcon** » Thu Aug 18, 2011 10:21 pm

Alien51 wrote:QUOTE (Alien51 @ Aug 19 2011, 01:17 AM) "EW Sniper 1: Damage increased to 44/second [28/s]"
"EW Sniper 1: Damage reduced to 40/s [44]"

QUOTE WHAT HAPPEN?[/quote]

QUOTE ( @ Aug 19 2011, 01:17 AM) Also you really don't need to zoom while using sniper.[/quote]

At least I said 'at least me'

Other than that... What's MW to say on Alien's elaboration...?

Seymor · Post by **Seymor** » Fri Aug 19, 2011 3:10 am

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Aug 18 2011, 03:39 PM) Wait Seymor gives a @#(! about my opinion? He must be mental. Oh yeah, that Seymor.

You've got around 10,000 posts on these voobs and hated at least 75% less in the community, there must at least be some type of valid points in your posts to make it so far.

Simple.

P.S. Yes I'm aware of the post count thread.