XT vs SysX

Dorjan · Post by **Dorjan** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:34 pm

Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Feb 21 2011, 09:49 PM) i dont get what the difference is between a league game and a squad game. Winning the league and tourney are like woot, we get a front page announcement or whatever. i know I didnt get any goodies in the mail, or special ingame perks or whatever. You show up and play because you like playing with the people in your squad, not because there is some intangible trophy if you do better than everyone else.

yep, you're right.

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:36 pm

unfortunately in dorjan's case, even if he did show up and play every sunday we have a lot of people who end up sitting because of low attendance from other squads

Dorjan · Post by **Dorjan** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:40 pm

NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Feb 21 2011, 10:36 PM) unfortunately in dorjan's case, even if he did show up and play every sunday we have a lot of people who end up sitting because of low attendance from other squads

That's a problem too. I've got a lot going on, so why should I make someone else sit when I could do something else.

I'm too nice

FIZ · Post by **FIZ** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:55 pm

Maybe if XT didn't every $#@!ing time complain whether they won or lost, more squads would take on. You take a victory and turn it into a trollfest. You take a loss and make a new abomination of a core.

You're a $#@!ing top tier squad, quit acting like a $#@!ing victim.

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:58 pm

I don't see the problem with holding things to a higher standard and refusing to accept the @#(! that idiots like you seem to be okay with guzzling, and I'm not sure why you or anyone else could believe that four years of essentially no progression in gameplay or balance is a good thing.

FIZ · Post by **FIZ** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:00 pm

Okay, I guess in the most literal terms making every faction an int faction would be considered balancing.

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:04 pm

Obviously being able to deploy stronger, faster, tougher carriers at reduced cost only benefits ints. Reduced tac prices also only benefit ints as well, and making fundamental changes to TF to shift that faction away from ints to bolster their poor-performing sup and tac obviously makes them an int faction. Restoring some of the power of Rix's sup also obviously makes Rix more of an int faction, too.

FIZ · Post by **FIZ** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:11 pm

I learned TF tac when it was hopelessly outbalanced. Just for the challenge and the 'you can't do that' factor. The community will decide if you're core is worthy playing. You only mentioned 2 factions, both good int ones at that, in your defense.

Shizoku · Post by **Shizoku** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:12 pm

Night based on the 12seconds I've spent grazing over the changelog I can solidly say that because you gave rix lt ints instead of basic figs, you have committed the worst atrocity imaginable - making another int core. You should do like everyone else and suck inept off so that you can get a seat on the cc board and continue destroying what was a great core(talking about dn, not any incarnation of cc).

NightRychune · Post by **NightRychune** » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:15 pm

Only two factions can take advantage of spending less on deploying enhanced carriers and spending less money on tac tech?

This is why our game threads turn into trollfests: because I and other XT have to waste our time refuting the idiocy people like you seem insistent on spouting.