Freyja wrote:QUOTE (Freyja @ May 6 2010, 04:35 PM) TF Scouts, I like these models too, they do seem a tad large- having said that need to play another few games to be sure.
The new model is quite large, hence the preemptive scale reduction in this release.
Unfortunately I think if we made it smaller the front profile would become too flat. Its something I'd definitely like to hear more feedback on though. Ditto with the OH models and all of the other new TF models now that they've been adjusted.
Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ May 7 2010, 05:45 AM) Can't say I'm a big fan of the new TF Adv Fig gunmounts, the way they double at the top middle spot is quite an eyesore.
Other than that minor thing it looks good.
The ships look good and those mounts are good to use... but maybe the top mounts could indeed be spread out a bit at the adv fig stage.
For the first time ever I'm enjoying flying TF sup. Strange feeling.
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH <bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
Hammer is certainly OP on a large amount of sbs, though bbrs might be ok due to the irregularity of late-game bombing with reg/hvy bbrs. LT hammer for sbs, pherhaps?
sbs should use reg hammer because it is just like 2 ab1 on a reg sb, except with a full rack of ammo so there is a higher chance of dying without using the ful rack of ammo to drop shields or whatever.
ryjamsan wrote:QUOTE (ryjamsan @ Mar 1 2011, 07:07 PM) Spidey let it go, I have reformed MW and taken him under my wing:)
phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Nov 16 2014, 05:12 PM) I'll make sure to never make you a commander again
An SB's rack of Hammer1 does very slightly (maybe 1%) more damage than IC's SB does in a rack of SRM AB1, and does so over more than 9 seconds, whereas a missile-based SB can fire off the first two missiles in just four seconds. Hammer's range is also restricted to 1000m, while you can fire your first SRM at 1400m.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
Beyond a shadow of a doubt if you don't watch them like a hawk they will stack their collective balls off - MrChaos on Alleg players
Compellor wrote:QUOTE (Compellor @ May 9 2010, 01:26 AM) An SB's rack of Hammer1 does very slightly (maybe 1%) more damage than IC's SB does in a rack of SRM AB1, and does so over more than 9 seconds, whereas a missile-based SB can fire off the first two missiles in just four seconds. Hammer's range is also restricted to 1000m, while you can fire your first SRM at 1400m.
Perhaps a better baseline of comparison would be TF SBS (using Ion Blaster?). TF sbs are eyed the instant before they begin firing, but it takes a few shots to equal an ab1.
"Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me." -2 Cor 12:9 "Never know how long I've waited, anticipated your smile pressed against mine." -Running
Clay_Pigeon wrote:QUOTE (Clay_Pigeon @ May 9 2010, 12:29 PM) Perhaps a better baseline of comparison would be TF SBS (using Ion Blaster?). TF sbs are eyed the instant before they begin firing, but it takes a few shots to equal an ab1.
Well, I thought of that, but Ion blaster is much less accurate, has a much shorter range, and is substantially more powerful, especially IB2.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
Beyond a shadow of a doubt if you don't watch them like a hawk they will stack their collective balls off - MrChaos on Alleg players
Andarvi wrote:QUOTE (Andarvi @ May 6 2010, 08:28 AM) I'm all for this as long as the pods mass is squared, then squared again. So when you ram someone they FEEL it.
