Player cap

fuzzylunkin1 · Post by **fuzzylunkin1** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:10 pm

Duckwarrior wrote:QUOTE (Duckwarrior @ Apr 24 2010, 02:41 AM) The idea was to stop everybody rushing to two or three squads.

That doesn't happen.

Jimen · Post by **Jimen** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:15 pm

Duckwarrior wrote:QUOTE (Duckwarrior @ Apr 24 2010, 03:41 AM) 7. It is not competitive for one team to have an unfair advantage over another.

I wouldn't call "having more and better players" to be an "unfair" advantage. Or should we ban superwhores like Weed, Drizzo, and Brood from squad play? You know, to keep things more "fair" to the squads that don't have someone that good?

It's not like SysX and XT are exactly snapping up all the Cadets, either. You're arguing from a wholly false pretense.

Duckwarrior · Post by **Duckwarrior** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:22 pm

I'm not arguing from any pretence, I'm offering a suggestion.

If you're happy with the current situation then that's fine.

Koln · Post by **Koln** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 5:29 pm

Jimen wrote:QUOTE (Jimen @ Apr 24 2010, 07:15 PM) It's not like SysX and XT are exactly snapping up all the Cadets, either.

And even if they did. XT got you and wins in spite of that.

takingarms1 · Post by **takingarms1** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:05 pm

Jimen wrote:QUOTE (Jimen @ Apr 24 2010, 01:15 PM) Or should we ban superwhores like Weed, Drizzo, and Brood from squad play? You know, to keep things more "fair" to the squads that don't have someone that good?

Hmm lets see, the three superwhores you name happen to be from the two top squads... coincidence?

Jimen · Post by **Jimen** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:37 pm

So? Should we boot them out because it's "unfair" to the other squads that don't have them?

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 6:59 pm

Ok

This isnt, at least to most of us talking, about who is best. This isnt some call for those recruiting to quite being so god damn sexy, start wearing a bag over their heads, and kicking out two of their six super models to "share". Its more of can we stop the arms race? The easiest way is by putting a limit on the number of people playing for a squad.

I was to dense to catch what TJ was saying until he spoon feed it to me in a pm.

What TJ was trying to say, better, than me is not to turn this into some kind of @#(! slinging contest. The competition is friendly... for the most part and what isnt never gets past "you're a poopiehead" "no Im not and you're a bigger poopiehead then me...

" stage. Id be shocked to hear that someone wouldnt directly help another squad that asked for say a scrimmage or some such thing.

So if we aren't going to do it

, just let's not turn this into something it isnt.. I mean the origionator of the idea has his choice of super models for example

Cheezits · Post by **Cheezits** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:34 pm

I think that there is a fair amount of parity between the squads right now. Its just that now there are less competent players around, so if 1 guy bails on a squad that can much more seriously damage a squad then it could in the past.

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 9:53 pm

yeah i cant say sysx has been exactly snatching every cdt to graduate. who was the last anyway? phantom?

_SRM_Nuke · Post by **_SRM_Nuke** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 10:02 pm

TakingArms wrote:QUOTE (TakingArms @ Apr 24 2010, 02:05 PM) Hmm lets see, the three superwhores you name happen to be from the two top squads... coincidence?

Sharing whores isn't hygienic. Besides, when was the last time you played a game? 500 days ago?