Just a Random thought

Tactical advice, How-to, Post-mortem, etc.
Dibbley2
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 12:44 am
Location: England

Post by Dibbley2 »

Yaknow. im sat at home chillin! listening to music. reading the foram.

If your always trying to increase the fun in Allegiance. eva thought of this:

When the finnal base in eny game is destroyed. that the game doesn't just finnish there! but carrys on? No base's! no hope what so eva of even buying 1! but who eva is out of base! and! not podded! stays alive! untill the oppossing force terminates EVERY remaining pilot!? or at least half! of that teams players.

Lets say blue has the map, yellow has a home gar only! and they are all on some retarded bombing session hitting the the blue teams 1 and only Supremacy.. blue goes for the kill on yellows garrison and blows it up! <------end of game!... but amagin it carried on? so yellow heads for the sup and kills it..yellow has no bases no hope in EVA building 1. but they have a bomber! and a handfull of nans. the rest that are podded on the yellows LOSSING team are automaticaly sent to the server screen! yellow carrys on to the enemys garrison. blue trys to defend. yellow takes the blue's 1 and only gar.. now only pilots remain! the last serviving pilot wins for the team! <------ So who eva can aim! wins for everyone!

just a random senario anyway. trying to help u amagine what i mean!!

Anyways ! BLAR!!

one of those random involentery thoughts we all have whilst trashed from excessive amounts of red win!.. lmao!
Anyway just an idea! u never know...

Peace Dibbs :thumbsup:
Last edited by Dibbley2 on Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jimen
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:39 pm
Location: Boston-ish

Post by Jimen »

stop thinking
Image
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

Yes, please complete your thoughts before sharing.

This is basically a punishment on the team that won and would make the game much less fun. It would also make for scenarios like a lame ass who flies 20k off grid and sits to drag the game out.
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Kreios
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 3:32 pm

Post by Kreios »

Jimen wrote:QUOTE (Jimen @ Apr 22 2010, 09:27 PM) stop thinking
Laced.

But how do you sort out people who will run away and transform the game into a crappy hide and seek thing. And the chances of the losing team turning the game around like that are minimal, I think that's why the game is as it is at the moment.
Image
RealPandemonium
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:32 am
Location: NY

Post by RealPandemonium »

Jimen wrote:QUOTE (Jimen @ Apr 22 2010, 04:27 PM) stop thinking
Image IMO
Edmond wrote:QUOTE (Edmond @ Aug 31 2010, 04:20 PM) I think girly's idea is much better, since it is more freeform, only needs to be updated by one person, and maintains the openness of the command channel without the spaminess. Plus it can have ASCII goatse.
LANS
Posts: 1030
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:17 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by LANS »

For issues and advantages with this idea, see Tremulous

Tremulous is analogous to alleg in that there is a base to defend, and you ahve to destroy the enemy team's base. Except that once you destroy the enemy team's base (so they can't respawn), you then need to hunt down the enemy to end the game. Its a "no one left alive" scenario. Notably, good coordinated teams tend to rally for one last rush after their base is destroyed, and quite often kill, or at least come close to killing the enemy base. What ends up happening in PUGs though is that idiot n00bs run around individually when their base is destroyed, generally taking a few minutes to die at the hand of the full-strength enemy while all the other players wait with nothing to do. This isn't much of a problem in trem because of the closed-small-map environment, but in alleg it would be a pain.

I can see issues with someone escaping in stealth tech and hiding.
ImageImage
Norgonq1
Posts: 439
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:39 am
Location: Latvia

Post by Norgonq1 »

We're not newbie-hating you Dibbley. It's just that the idea is halfassed.
ImageImage
RealPandemonium
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:32 am
Location: NY

Post by RealPandemonium »

LANS wrote:QUOTE (LANS @ Apr 22 2010, 05:05 PM) For issues and advantages with this idea, see Tremulous

Tremulous is analogous to alleg in that there is a base to defend, and you ahve to destroy the enemy team's base. Except that once you destroy the enemy team's base (so they can't respawn), you then need to hunt down the enemy to end the game. Its a "no one left alive" scenario. Notably, good coordinated teams tend to rally for one last rush after their base is destroyed, and quite often kill, or at least come close to killing the enemy base. What ends up happening in PUGs though is that idiot n00bs run around individually when their base is destroyed, generally taking a few minutes to die at the hand of the full-strength enemy while all the other players wait with nothing to do. This isn't much of a problem in trem because of the closed-small-map environment, but in alleg it would be a pain.

I can see issues with someone escaping in stealth tech and hiding.
It's a pain in the ass in Tremulous too. I load the next map when that happens.
Image IMO
Edmond wrote:QUOTE (Edmond @ Aug 31 2010, 04:20 PM) I think girly's idea is much better, since it is more freeform, only needs to be updated by one person, and maintains the openness of the command channel without the spaminess. Plus it can have ASCII goatse.
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

sadly, dibbley is not a newbie, just another sf pilot
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
SpaceJunk
Posts: 759
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Collision orbit

Post by SpaceJunk »

Yup, I hate it too when it happens in Tremulous.

Also, in order to mercifully derail this topic, I wanted to call your attention to the fact that Allegiance is credited in the Urban Dictionary as the source of 'voob'
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=voob
Image
Post Reply