Clay_Pigeon wrote:QUOTE (Clay_Pigeon @ Feb 22 2010, 09:29 AM) We need to somehow work Fedman into this thread.
You just did
[indent][/indent]Former Squad leader and Assitant Squad Leader BLACKSHADOW™ "Retired" "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what's for dinner" "Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote".
Yes, XT just "got a few good moves in" that castrated you for the rest of the game. Kills? Deaths? You got two miner loads in thirty minutes! We had adv tech before you had a techbase! Besides, "we do well when everything clicks"? You might as well just cut the crap and say "sometimes we get lucky". Maybe you're not aware, Striker, but EVERY squad has to show up EVERY Sunday for squadgames with their game face on, and I don't get why squads keep using "oh we just couldn't play well this week" as some kind of an excuse. Sure, maybe if you guys tried really REALLY hard you'd have beaten us...but what's it matter if you get your ass kicked about as badly as it could have possibly been kicked because you couldn't bring that sort of performance when it counted.
When XT was losing games just months ago, I don't recall anyone making blithering excuses for our losses - we kept quiet in Gameplay, let people have their fun at our expense, and focused all that pain into making sure it wouldn't happen again. So now we're carnage incarnate, and the whines of squads who'll never really improve are music to our ears.
Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Feb 21 2010, 04:46 PM) Everyone can have an off day, and I'd trust Dorj's ability as a com to tell generally being outclassed from a sucky performance. Looks like a decent XT team though, even on full power SF would have struggled IMO.
Not to be a dick but if you actually go and read every gameplay thread about @SF in 103% of them they say some variation of "not our best game"
Why can't they play their best game ever and still get $#@!ed up?
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Feb 21 2010, 04:37 PM) We do great when we play well but... we don't play well. If we played better, everything would click.
p.s. You're not better than us, we just played worse than you.
Last edited by Mastametz on Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Feb 21 2010, 07:37 PM) You're funny Spidey. SF is sort of hot or cold. We do great when everything clicks and sometimes we don't play very well. Common sense would tell you when you don't play very well you usually don't win. Do I say that every game? Probably not, but I have brought it up before.
Sorry, but there are plenty of games where SysX has played to the best of their ability and still has lost. It certainly cheapens your opponents win to always have an excuse though.
Oh well to each their own
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
Orion wrote:QUOTE (Orion @ Feb 21 2010, 08:59 PM) Real show of sportsmanship here, as usual.
I'm saving this, only because it came from you.
cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Oct 16 2010, 02:48 AM) Interceptors are fun because without one, Drizzo would be physically incapable of entering a sector.
spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Feb 22 2010, 01:48 AM) Not to be a dick but if you actually go and read every gameplay thread about @SF in 103% of them they say some variation of "not our best game"
Why can't they play their best game ever and still get $#@!ed up?
We do. Just rarely seems to happen
edit: Also, I did say how well XT played but I was pretty much saying "sorry we were such fail since we wanted to put up a better fight". XT played an amazing game but we should've and could've put up a better fight.
Simple as that. L2R!
Last edited by Dorjan on Mon Feb 22, 2010 2:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Feb 22 2010, 12:37 AM) This thread is absolutely hilarious. XT is acting like they "curb stomped" us when in reality they got a few good moves in that killed our economy.
TBH that is pretty much what a curb stomp is. They killed us swiftly...
However at everyone who think we're trying to cheaping this for XT. THey played very well, we sucked hence the walk over. Would've been a good game if we actually bothered to try >.>
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?