Is there any point?
As much as I love Aarm, why not get someone else to ZL? Just noone stepping up?
Get over yourselves, don't try to win arguments on the internet where the option of a punch in the mouth is unavailable
"It is not that I cannot create anything good, but that I will not." And to prove this, he created the peacock.
I think you'll find I voted on that poll.pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Mar 26 2009, 09:33 PM) Hey, we have an internal poll running for three weeks now... Four ppl have voted so far.
[img]http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/st ... erator.gif" alt="IPB Image">
[url=http://pk.dras.us]
This gives me memories of XCOM Apocalypse somehowQuia wrote:QUOTE (Quia @ Mar 27 2009, 05:00 AM) What, like these?
The artwork for OH is practically finished, the rest is out of this texturers league.
--
But yeah as stated before this is Community Core, we are looking forward to OH but its not a neccessary addition to CC, there have been plenty of other requests with high poll results but no talks of public action by the CC Dev Team.
I am an ICE noob as well as a modelling noob so I don't know how hard it would be to add DEB's, or to change gunmounts or to fix hitboxes but i'm not seeing any public talk of that (except Rama and hitboxes.
The last change I have seen is adding the new sexy Dreg Carrier and nerfing XRM's and nothing since then.
Personally I cracked up with the combination of the avatar and the accompanying "POWERSTROKE" text.notjarvis wrote:QUOTE (notjarvis @ Mar 27 2009, 10:56 AM) I'm sure this thread was a very interesting discussion, but I seem to have lost it at the point where weed posted.
No idea why
Last edited by Adept on Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
I can't see who voted...Adam4 wrote:QUOTE (Adam4 @ Mar 27 2009, 11:21 AM) I think you'll find I voted on that poll.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Really Andon, that didn't need to be said. Most of us play the game and give sugestions, we vote as a comunity on what we think might help you at balancing. You guys ignoring us and then saying "You guys know @#(! about balance we'll do what we want" isn't what we want to hear.Andon wrote:QUOTE (Andon @ Mar 27 2009, 01:29 AM) And when we see stuff like that, we generally pick through, find a few ideas, and debate them internally, as, no offense intended, most people don't see how things can change balance in a wide scope.
That's all you needed to say, thank you. Posts where we've all agreed on something means there is a strong ONE WAY opinion about something. Knowing you guys accept that (in other words, post saying, "thanks guys, we'll think of something soon") and are debating what exactly to do (and then telling us when you've decided in the NOT SO DISTANT future) would help.Andon wrote:QUOTE (Andon @ Mar 27 2009, 01:29 AM) Letting you guys know that we will be doing SOMETHING, though, can be done, and when we decide on something we can also let you know then
Don't think you are above the rest of us because you have had your hand in designing things. You haven't got the best reputation on getting balance right yourself.
</rant>
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
You want to hear this?!Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Mar 27 2009, 05:41 PM) Really Andon, that didn't need to be said. Most of us play the game and give sugestions, we vote as a comunity on what we think might help you at balancing. You guys ignoring us and then saying "You guys know @#(! about balance we'll do what we want" isn't what we want to hear.
From Community Core Office, topic "Gettin' back on track"
Inset some OH stuff here...
aarmstrong wrote:QUOTE (aarmstrong @ Feb 7 2009, 05:25 AM) I really think waiting until OH is complete before releasing it (at least to the general public) is a good thing. It will need balancing, mind you, but at least they will look awesome.
Since I really don't play a whole lot anymore, what seems to be the biggest bitch right now? Do we need to release a patch before we go all out on OH?
Insert 4 OH posts here...pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Feb 7 2009, 01:05 PM) Just to list a few bitches:
Belters keep TP2 (and XRM) without having a SupBelter SF ammo is brokenppl request to increase TF Int model sizeIC FB costs 250 instand of 200
Insert some discussion about changes between Ramaglor, Andon and myself here...pkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Feb 24 2009, 06:17 PM) Anyone else has an opinion?
Or is this just the OH social club, which just ignores the requests of the community members?!
If I'm right, get me out of here.
End of topicpkk wrote:QUOTE (pkk @ Mar 5 2009, 06:53 PM) So can we pool a list of proposed changes, we can run via ASGS Poll?
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.