should nan restore energy of the target ?

juckto · Post by **juckto** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:06 am

QUOTE should nan restore energy of the target ?[/quote]
No. If anything, it should drain the energy of the target to simulate the nanobots leeching the craft's energy as they conduct repairs.

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:08 am

guitarism wrote:QUOTE (guitarism @ Sep 17 2008, 04:45 AM) Why are we worried about code changes like this when we're still without Ally teams? Get on the important things

coding is often boring once you know exactly what must be done.

And ATM, I feel pretty alone in the dev team. all others are MIA /rolleyes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roll:" border="0" alt="rolleyes.gif" />

so i'm just in a 'flood the forums' mood /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

Dark_Sponge · Post by **Dark_Sponge** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:13 am

KGJV wrote:QUOTE (KGJV @ Sep 16 2008, 05:52 PM) This is much like the 'one side resonator' option I did for R4. it's there but no core use it. So, so far, it was wasted dev time /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

Hmm, how do you choose that option? ICE?

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:25 am

Dark_Sponge wrote:QUOTE (Dark_Sponge @ Sep 17 2008, 05:13 AM) Hmm, how do you choose that option? ICE?

yes

Psychosis · Post by **Psychosis** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:03 am

I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone

madpeople · Post by **madpeople** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:21 am

Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 07:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone

you want to use XVI32 instead?

i think kg is working on a new version of ICE, or at least adding extra features.

Drizzo · Post by **Drizzo** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:26 pm

Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 02:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone

if you feel that way, you do realize nobody is stopping you from making something better. or you could pay someone to do it for you.

if you can do neither, then I don't see why you feel the need to insult kage and his hard work... nevermind I forgot who I was speaking to

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:38 pm

Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 08:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone

I just SERIOUSLY don't understand what "scrap ice" means in this context ? /rolleyes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roll:" border="0" alt="rolleyes.gif" />

Bouwman · Post by **Bouwman** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:30 pm

Another diasvantage is Rix SR's cross nanning each other with bbr=Bomb all opponent's bases off the map in one run /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />

Psychosis · Post by **Psychosis** » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:47 pm

Because I would LOVE to play with all these new features, but ICE is not compatible with alot of it. Sadly right now I do not have the time to rewrite ICE.

on second though, I think that we should consider switching to an energy restoring gun, instead of using nan by itself